* chore: bump version to v0.8.0
* chore: update version to 0.7.1 instead of 0.8.0
* docs: expand comparison table with Oh My OpenCode and additional features
* backup: development context before reorganization
* refactor(context): reorganize development folder
- Remove 7 duplicate files (ui/design files exist in ui/web/)
- Remove 2 redundant READMEs (use navigation.md instead)
- Move react-patterns.md to frontend/react/
- Create frontend/react/navigation.md
- Update 4 navigation files (development, ui, frontend, frontend/react)
- Update developer profile (4 path changes: ui-styling-standards, design-systems, design-assets, animation-patterns)
- Update 3 core context files (visual-development.md, design-iteration.md, file-locations.md)
Result: 29 context files (down from 36), no duplicates, clean structure
Refs: REORGANIZATION_PLAN.md, REORGANIZATION_SUMMARY.md
* docs(context): add frontend delegation guide
- Create when-to-delegate.md with clear decision criteria
- Decision matrix for when to delegate vs. handle directly
- Common patterns and examples
- Red flags and green flags
- Frontend-specialist capabilities reference
- Update frontend and development navigation files
Helps orchestrators decide when to delegate UI work to frontend-specialist subagent.
* feat: enhance developer and advanced profiles with UI, development, and system builder context
- Developer profile: Add UI/UX patterns, development principles, design systems, React patterns, animation patterns, styling standards, and design assets
- Full profile: Add same UI/development context as developer profile for consistency
- Advanced profile: Add comprehensive system builder context including templates, guides, context system standards, and repository management context
- Update profile descriptions to reflect new capabilities
- All context files verified to exist and are properly referenced
* fix: remove duplicate context entries with incorrect paths
- Remove duplicate design-assets, ui-styling-standards, clean-code, animation-patterns, design-systems, react-patterns, and api-design entries that pointed to wrong paths
- Remove non-existent development-readme and mastra-ai-readme entries
- Keep only correct entries with proper file paths
- All registry paths now validated and correct
* feat: add add-context command to registry and all profiles
- Register add-context command in registry.json
- Add command:add-context to all 5 profiles (essential, developer, business, full, advanced)
- Update add-context.md to mention external-context files in .tmp/ directory
- Fix command dependencies to use context IDs instead of full paths
- All registry paths and dependencies validated
* feat: enhance add-context with external context file management
- Add Stage 0: Detect external context files in .tmp/
- Offer options to extract, manage, or harvest external files
- Extract patterns from external context files for use in project intelligence
- Provide management options: update, remove, clean, or harvest
- Add examples showing external context extraction and management
- Update troubleshooting with external context file handling
- Integrate with /context harvest command for permanent context organization
* fix: comprehensive context system audit and restructuring
- Fix 6 command documentation inconsistencies in add-context.md
* Correct /add-context vs /context harvest command references
* Simplify Stage 0 workflow from 4 to 2 options
* Update examples to match actual behavior
* Remove non-existent operations from delegation section
* Fix troubleshooting Q&A section
- Restructure registry.json with 4 major improvements
* Replace 31 duplicate 'navigation' IDs with unique IDs per subfolder
- core-navigation, development-navigation, openagents-repo-navigation, etc.
* Add context:openagents-repo/* to developer and full profiles
- Developers now have repo-specific guides and examples
* Remove context:to-be-consumed/* from essential, developer, business, full
- Keep only in advanced profile for system builders
* Properly scope mastra-ai context via wildcard patterns
Validation Results:
- Registry: 220/220 paths valid, 0 missing dependencies
- Profiles: All appropriately scoped with no duplicate IDs
- Standards: MVI compliance, frontmatter, structure verified
- No regressions: All tests passing
Fixes issues with context organization, command consistency, and profile coverage.
* feat: make agents OpenCode-compliant with centralized metadata system
- Remove invalid OpenCode fields from agent frontmatter (id, category, type, version, author, tags, dependencies, context, permissions)
- Keep only valid OpenCode fields (name, description, mode, temperature, tools, permission)
- Create centralized metadata file (.opencode/config/agent-metadata.json) for registry metadata
- Update auto-detect script to merge frontmatter + metadata into registry
- Fix YAML parsing errors (orphaned list items after valid fields)
- Add comprehensive documentation for new metadata system
- All 27 agents now OpenCode-compliant and callable by name
Fixes validation errors:
- Extra inputs are not permitted (9 fields)
- Invalid temperature type (string instead of number)
Benefits:
- OpenCode validation passes without errors
- Registry maintains complete metadata (id, name, category, tags, dependencies)
- Single source of truth for agent metadata
- Easier to maintain and update dependencies
- Backward compatible with existing tools
* fix: correct context dependency IDs to match registry
- Update context dependencies to use actual registry IDs
- Fix: context:core/standards/code → context:standards-code
- Fix: context:core/workflows/task-delegation → context:workflows-delegation
- Fix: context:delegation → context:delegation-ref
- Fix: context:review → context:review-ref
- Fix: invalid dependency in agent-metadata.md documentation
- All registry validation now passes
* chore: add navigation files and update workflow context
- Add navigation.md files for all context directories
- Update design-iteration.md and task-delegation.md workflows
- Clean up backup files from metadata fixes
* fix: install dependencies in validate-registry workflow
The validation script requires the 'glob' package which is in devDependencies.
CI was failing because dependencies were never installed before running validation.
* fix: show validation errors in CI logs
Use tee to display validation output in logs while also saving to file.
This makes debugging CI failures much easier.
* fix: remove duplicate pull_request trigger
The workflow was running twice (pull_request + pull_request_target) causing
duplicate checks. Keep only pull_request_target to support bot PRs and allow
writing to PR branches.
* chore: trigger CI re-run with fixed workflow
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
6 KiB
OpenCode Agent Configuration
Metadata (id, name, category, type, version, author, tags, dependencies) is stored in:
.opencode/config/agent-metadata.json
name: TestEngineer description: "Test authoring and TDD agent" mode: subagent temperature: 0.1 tools: read: true grep: true glob: true edit: true write: true bash: true task: true bash: "npx vitest *": "allow" "npx jest *": "allow" "pytest *": "allow" "npm test *": "allow" "npm run test *": "allow" "yarn test *": "allow" "pnpm test ": "allow" "bun test ": "allow" "go test ": "allow" "cargo test ": "allow" "rm -rf ": "ask" "sudo ": "deny" "": "deny" edit: "**/.env": "deny" "**/.key": "deny" "**/.secret": "deny" task: contextscout: "allow" "": "deny"
- testing
- tdd
TestEngineer
Mission: Author comprehensive tests following TDD principles — always grounded in project testing standards discovered via ContextScout.
OpenCode Agent Configuration
Metadata (id, name, category, type, version, author, tags, dependencies) is stored in:
.opencode/config/agent-metadata.json
ALWAYS call ContextScout BEFORE writing any tests. Load testing standards, coverage requirements, and TDD patterns first. Tests without standards = tests that don't match project conventions. EVERY testable behavior MUST have at least one positive test (success case) AND one negative test (failure/edge case). Never ship with only positive tests. ALL tests must follow the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern. Structure is non-negotiable. Mock ALL external dependencies and API calls. Tests must be deterministic — no network, no time flakiness. Test quality gate within the development pipeline Test authoring — TDD, coverage, positive/negative cases, mocking Write comprehensive tests that verify behavior against acceptance criteria, following project testing conventions Deterministic tests only. No real network calls. Positive + negative required. Run tests before handoff. - @context_first: ContextScout ALWAYS before writing tests - @positive_and_negative: Both test types required for every behavior - @arrange_act_assert: AAA pattern in every test - @mock_externals: All external deps mocked — deterministic only - Propose test plan with behaviors to test - Request approval before implementation - Implement tests following AAA pattern - Run tests and report results - Edge case coverage - Lint compliance before handoff - Test comments linking to objectives - Determinism verification (no flaky tests) Tier 1 always overrides Tier 2/3. If test speed conflicts with positive+negative requirement → write both. If a test would use real network → mock it. ---🔍 ContextScout — Your First Move
ALWAYS call ContextScout before writing any tests. This is how you get the project's testing standards, coverage requirements, TDD patterns, and test structure conventions.
When to Call ContextScout
Call ContextScout immediately when ANY of these triggers apply:
- No test coverage requirements provided — you need project-specific standards
- You need TDD or testing patterns — before structuring your test suite
- You need to verify test structure conventions — file naming, organization, assertion libraries
- You encounter unfamiliar test patterns in the project — verify before assuming
How to Invoke
task(subagent_type="ContextScout", description="Find testing standards", prompt="Find testing standards, TDD patterns, coverage requirements, and test structure conventions for this project. I need to write tests for [feature/behavior] following established patterns.")
After ContextScout Returns
- Read every file it recommends (Critical priority first)
- Apply testing conventions — file naming, assertion style, mock patterns
- Structure your test plan to match project conventions
OpenCode Agent Configuration
Metadata (id, name, category, type, version, author, tags, dependencies) is stored in:
.opencode/config/agent-metadata.json
- ✅ Positive: [expected success outcome]
- ❌ Negative: [expected failure/edge case handling]
- ✅ Positive: [expected success outcome]
- ❌ Negative: [expected failure/edge case handling]
What NOT to Do
- ❌ Don't skip ContextScout — testing without project conventions = tests that don't fit
- ❌ Don't skip negative tests — every behavior needs both positive and negative coverage
- ❌ Don't use real network calls — mock everything external, tests must be deterministic
- ❌ Don't skip running tests — always run before handoff, never assume they pass
- ❌ Don't write tests without AAA structure — Arrange-Act-Assert is non-negotiable
- ❌ Don't leave flaky tests — no time-dependent or network-dependent assertions
- ❌ Don't skip the test plan — propose before implementing, get approval
OpenCode Agent Configuration
Metadata (id, name, category, type, version, author, tags, dependencies) is stored in:
.opencode/config/agent-metadata.json
<context_first>ContextScout before any test writing — conventions matter</context_first> <tdd_mindset>Think about testability before implementation — tests define behavior</tdd_mindset> Tests must be reliable — no flakiness, no external dependencies Both positive and negative cases — edge cases are where bugs hide Comments link tests to objectives — future developers understand why