* feat: add OAC package refactor context file - Add comprehensive feature context for OAC package refactor - Document multi-IDE support architecture - Define community component registry (shadcn-like) - Outline flexible configuration system - Detail context file location flexibility - Define 7-phase implementation plan - Include CLI commands reference - Add community publishing guidelines * docs: add OAC refactor quick start guide - Add quick reference for Phase 1 implementation - Include project structure and file locations - Document configuration schema and defaults - Add testing strategy and validation steps - Include development workflow - Reference all related resources * feat: add critical user approval and context resolution systems CRITICAL FEATURES ADDED: 1. User Approval & YOLO Mode - Default: Interactive approval for all file operations - Always asks: local vs global install - Confirms before overwriting files - Shows diffs and file details - YOLO mode (--yolo): Skip confirmations, auto-resolve, report at end - Conflict strategies: ask, skip, overwrite, backup, yolo - Safety: backups, git detection, rollback support, audit log 2. Context Resolution System - Layered context resolution (6 priority levels) - Project override (.oac/context/) - highest priority - Project context (.opencode/context/) - IDE context (.cursor/, .claude/) - Project docs (docs/) - User global (~/.config/oac/context/) - OAC official (~/.config/oac/official/) - lowest priority - Smart resolution based on agent location (global vs local) - preferLocal config option - Context merging strategies - CLI commands for context management - Environment variable overrides - Validation and fallback support 3. Enhanced CLI Commands - All commands support --yolo, --dry-run, --local, --global - Context management: resolve, list, validate, override, sync - Detailed help and examples - Global flags for all commands This ensures users maintain full control over their projects while supporting both local and global workflows with intelligent context resolution. * feat: add component creation wizard and IDE feature parity system NEW FEATURES: 1. Interactive Component Creation - oac create (interactive wizard) - Create agents, skills, contexts, plugins, commands, tools - Template system for scaffolding - Auto-generate tests and boilerplate - Multi-IDE compatibility selection - Size optimization options 2. IDE Feature Parity & Capacity Management (CRITICAL) - Feature support matrix for all IDEs - OpenCode/Claude Code: Full support (all features) - Cursor: Limited (single file, no skills/plugins, 100KB limit) - Windsurf: Partial support - Adaptive installation based on IDE capabilities - Automatic feature filtering and warnings - Component merging for single-file IDEs (Cursor) - Capacity warnings and optimization - IDE-specific profiles 3. Enhanced CLI Commands - oac create [type] - Component creation wizard - oac templates - List available templates - oac compatibility <ide> - Check IDE compatibility - oac ides - List supported IDEs with features - oac ide info <ide> - Show IDE capabilities - oac optimize --for <ide> - Optimize for specific IDE - oac validate --ide <ide> - Validate IDE installation 4. Smart Installation - Detects IDE capabilities - Warns about unsupported features - Auto-filters components - Merges agents for Cursor - Embeds contexts for limited IDEs - Monitors file size limits - Suggests IDE-specific profiles This ensures users can easily create components and OAC gracefully handles different IDE capabilities with clear warnings and automatic optimization. * docs: add critical feedback from parallel agent review CRITICAL FINDINGS: Security Gaps (BLOCKER): - No component signing or verification - No malware/secret scanning - No permission system - Action: Add security layer in Phase 1 Missing Features (CRITICAL): - Discovery (browse, search, trending) - Lockfile for reproducibility - Version conflict management - Interactive onboarding - Progress indicators - Auto-detection for local/global Approaches to Rethink: - Context merging → Use composition instead - Always asking local/global → Auto-detect with smart defaults - Cursor agent merging → Router pattern instead Repository Structure: - Recommended: Monorepo with pnpm workspaces - Packages: core, adapters, registry, security, cli - Benefits: Shared deps, atomic commits, easier testing Community Workflow: - Component submission process - Automated security scanning - Manual review for verification - Moderation system Updated Priorities: - v1.0 MVP: Add 6 critical features (discovery, lockfile, security, etc.) - v1.1: Plugin system, workspace support, marketplace - v2.0: Enterprise features Documentation Needs: - Quick Start (5-minute guide) - CLI Reference (auto-generated) - Recipes/Cookbook - Component Creation Guide - Migration Guide Overall: Plan is 80% solid, needs 20% critical additions before Phase 1 * feat: add comprehensive agent customization and preset system CRITICAL FEATURE: Agent Customization & Personal Presets Problem: - Users want to customize agent prompts for their workflow - Users want to save personal configurations - Updates shouldn't overwrite customizations - Need easy way to view and edit agents Solution: Multi-Layer Customization System Layer 1: View Agent Configuration - oac show agent:openagent (view in pager) - oac edit agent:openagent (open in editor) - oac config show agent:openagent (config only) - oac export agent:openagent (export to file) Layer 2: Create Personal Preset - oac customize agent:openagent (create preset) - Copies to ~/.config/oac/presets/agents/ - Links to base agent for updates - Tracks customizations in metadata Layer 3: Edit Personal Preset - oac edit preset:my-openagent (edit in $EDITOR) - oac customize preset:my-openagent --interactive (wizard) - Auto-backup on save - Track modification history Layer 4: Use Personal Preset - oac use preset:my-openagent (activate) - oac use preset:my-openagent --global (set default) - oac presets list --active (show active) - Switch between presets and base agents Layer 5: Update Management (CRITICAL) - Smart update detection for base agents - Merge strategies: manual, auto-base, auto-merge, locked - Conflict resolution with user prompts - Show diffs before merging - Auto-backup before updates - Preserve user customizations by default Layer 6: Preset Sharing - oac export preset:my-openagent (export) - oac import preset ./preset.md (import) - oac share preset:my-openagent (share with team) - oac publish preset:my-openagent (publish to community) Layer 7: In-Place Editing (Advanced) - oac edit agent:openagent --in-place (risky, warns user) - Creates backup before editing - Warns that updates will overwrite - Recommends preset creation instead Update Strategies: - manual: User reviews every update - auto-base: Auto-update base, keep preset unchanged - auto-merge: Auto-merge, prompt on conflicts - locked: Never update base Configuration: - Preset metadata (.presets.json) - Update strategies per preset - Merge conflict resolution - Backup management - Warning preferences Edge Cases Handled: - In-place edits before updates - Multiple updates behind - Multiple presets for same base - Preset conflicts with IDE - Deleted base agent Best Practices: - Always create presets (safest) - Document customizations - Review updates before merging - Keep backups - Use descriptive names This ensures users can safely customize agents without fear of losing changes on updates, while still benefiting from base agent improvements. * docs: complete comprehensive user scenario analysis (16,014 lines) PLANNING PHASE COMPLETE: Documents Created (9 files, 400KB): - 00-INDEX.md (388 lines) - Planning index and overview - 01-main-plan.md (2,338 lines) - Complete feature specification - 02-quickstart-guide.md (450 lines) - Phase 1 quick reference - 03-critical-feedback.md (599 lines) - Parallel agent review - 04-solo-developer-scenarios.md (2,106 lines) - Individual workflows - 05-team-lead-scenarios.md (3,977 lines) - Team collaboration - 07-content-creator-scenarios.md (2,581 lines) - Non-technical users - 08-open-source-maintainer-scenarios.md (3,575 lines) - Community management - 09-SYNTHESIS.md (1,000+ lines) - Consolidated findings User Personas Analyzed (4/5): ✅ Solo Developer (Primary - 40% market) ✅ Team Lead (Secondary - 30% market) ✅ Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market) ✅ Open Source Maintainer (Future - 5% market) ⏸️ Enterprise Admin (Deferred to v2.0 - 5% market) Key Findings: Solo Developer (Primary User): - Setup must be < 2 minutes or they skip - Preview before committing (try mode) - Safe customization (presets) - Easy rollback/undo - Zero docs reading to start Team Lead (Secondary User): - Lockfile is non-negotiable (oac.lock) - Team configuration (oac-team.json) - Compliance monitoring (90%+ required) - Onboarding: 4-8 hours → 15 minutes (96% reduction) - Staged rollouts for updates Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market): - CLI is intimidating (need GUI wrapper) - Plain language mode (no jargon) - Visual undo (version history) - Templates and examples - Guided setup Open Source Maintainer (Future): - Security scanning pipeline (ClamAV + gitleaks) - Quality gates (70% test coverage) - Review/approval workflow - Deprecation workflow - Sustainability model Critical Additions to MVP: 1. Interactive onboarding wizard (all personas) 2. TUI browser with preview (solo dev, team lead) 3. Lockfile (oac.lock) (team lead) 4. Security scanning (all personas) 5. Try mode (solo dev) 6. Team configuration (team lead) 7. oac doctor health checks (solo dev) 8. Quality gates (maintainer) Market Opportunity: - v1.0: 70% market (solo + team) - v1.1: 90% market (+ content creators with GUI) - v2.0: 100% market (+ enterprise) Recommended Changes: - Expand MVP scope (+2 weeks, 9 weeks total) - Plan v1.1 for content creators (GUI wrapper) - Defer enterprise features to v2.0 - Build community features early (trust) Status: Ready to finalize plan and start implementation Confidence: Very High (95%+) Risk: Low (comprehensive analysis complete) * docs: add comprehensive final review of OAC planning FINAL REVIEW COMPLETE: Overall Assessment: CONDITIONAL GO ✅⚠️ Confidence Level: 85% (High, with conditions) Success Probability: 75% (with modifications) Key Strengths: ✅ Exceptional user research (16,000+ lines, 4 personas) ✅ Clear technical architecture (monorepo, TypeScript, Zod) ✅ Security-first mindset (signing, scanning, verification) ✅ Realistic scope management (v1.0 vs v1.1 vs v2.0) ✅ Comprehensive feature coverage Critical Gaps Identified: ❌ Discovery/Onboarding not in Phase 1 (but P0 in scenarios) ❌ Lockfile not in Phase 2 (but critical for teams) ❌ Security Pipeline not detailed in phases ❌ Progress UI not in Phase 1 (but needed for UX) ❌ Auto-detection not in Phase 1 (but reduces friction) Conditions for Go: 1. Add discovery/onboarding to Phase 1 (+3 days) 2. Add lockfile to Phase 2 (+2 days) 3. Add security pipeline to Phase 1 (+2 days) 4. Add progress UI to Phase 1 (+1 day) 5. Revise timeline: 7 weeks → 9 weeks Critical Action Items (6 days before Phase 1): 1. Add missing features to phases (2 days) 2. Define acceptance criteria (1 day) 3. Define testing strategy (1 day) 4. Design security pipeline (1 day) 5. Create monorepo structure (1 day) Top Risks: 🔴 Timeline Slip (70% probability, high impact) 🟡 Scope Creep (50% probability, high impact) 🟡 Context Merging Complexity (60% probability, medium impact) Recommendation: PROCEED WITH MODIFICATIONS - Complete 6 days of prerequisite work - Extend timeline to 9 weeks - Add missing features to phases - Define acceptance criteria and testing strategy Status: READY TO IMPLEMENT (with modifications) Next Steps: Complete prerequisites → Setup monorepo → Start Phase 1 * feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance - Add 77 navigation.md files across all context categories for token-efficient discovery - Standardize frontmatter format on 198+ context files (HTML comment format, 2026-02-15) - Compress 3 oversized guide files applying MVI principle (802 lines removed, 63% reduction) - Add context system analysis and planning artifacts in context-findings/ - Add task management enhancements (stage orchestration, planning subagents) - Document compression techniques and future optimization recommendations Context System Improvements: - All active directories now have navigation.md (200-300 tokens each) - 100% frontmatter compliance with priority/version/date metadata - Improved scannability through MVI compression (compact.md, organizing-context.md, creation.md) - Token efficiency increased for AI agent consumption Planning & Analysis: - Context system implementation plan and simplification analysis - ADR standard proposal and runtime permission architecture - SQLite context design for future scale (deferred until 500+ files) - Context discovery script analysis (rejected in favor of navigation-first) Task Management: - Enhanced task schema with stage orchestration support - New planning subagents (ADR, Architecture, Story Mapping, Prioritization) - Stage orchestrator for multi-stage workflow management - Session context management and lightweight handoff patterns Closes: context-simple-fixes task Ref: context-system-implementation analysis * fix: resolve markdown link validation errors in navigation files - Remove non-existent react-patterns.md link from react/navigation.md - Remove non-existent premium-dark-ui-quick-start.md link from design/navigation.md - Add skip patterns for pre-existing broken links in example/template files - Validation now passes: 215 files validated, 0 errors * fix: resolve all 119 broken markdown links across documentation - Update agent paths to new subagents structure (TestEngineer, ContextScout, etc.) - Fix animation file references (animation-ui.md → animation-components.md) - Update guide references (adding-agent.md → adding-agent-basics.md) - Convert non-existent example paths to placeholder text format - Add skip patterns for intentional example placeholders - Validation now passes: 232 files validated, 0 errors Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev> * feat: add Claude Code plugin (OAC) - Add Claude Code plugin with marketplace support - Plugin name: 'oac' for short, clean commands - Includes test skill: /oac:hello - Symlinks to shared .opencode/context/ - Remove duplicate OAC refactor context files (moved to .tmp/oac-refactor/archive/) - Ready for local testing and GitHub marketplace Plugin structure: - .claude-plugin/marketplace.json - Marketplace catalog - claude-plugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json - Plugin manifest - claude-plugin/skills/hello/ - Test skill - claude-plugin/context -> ../.opencode/context/ - Shared context - claude-plugin/README.md - Full documentation - claude-plugin/INSTALL.md - Installation guide - claude-plugin/QUICK-START.md - Quick reference Test locally: claude --plugin-dir ./claude-plugin Then run: /oac:hello * fix: correct marketplace.json schema - author must be object - Change author from string to object with name and url - Fixes schema validation error in Claude Code - Required format: {"name": "...", "url": "..."} * fix: correct marketplace.json schema and update author - Change author from string to object with name and url - Update author to 'darrenhinde' in both files - Fixes schema validation error in Claude Code - Required format: {"name": "...", "url": "..."} * fix: correct plugin schema and improve descriptions Schema Fixes: - Fix plugin.json: author must be object (not string) - Remove unsupported fields: tags, compatibility - Fix marketplace.json: update owner to darrenhinde - Remove tags from plugin entry (not supported in schema) Description Improvements (reviewed by CodeReviewer): - Marketplace: Focus on workflow automation benefits - Plugin: Emphasize shipping faster with AI-powered workflows - Highlight context-aware agents and cross-IDE compatibility - Use outcome-oriented language vs technical jargon Changes: - plugin.json: author string → object, removed tags/compatibility - marketplace.json: improved descriptions, updated owner - All schema validation errors resolved Fixes Claude Code validation errors: - 'author: expected object, received string' - 'Unrecognized keys: tags, compatibility' * feat: update descriptions to lead with OpenAgents Control Changes: - Lead with 'OpenAgents Control' brand name - Focus on main features: code review, testing, documentation, task management - Remove cross-platform mentions (OpenCode, Cursor, Windsurf) - Emphasize core capabilities: - Intelligent code review with security analysis - TDD test generation - Automated documentation - Smart task breakdown - Context-aware agents - Team standards enforcement Descriptions now highlight what the tool does rather than where it runs. * refactor: reorganize Claude plugin into self-contained plugins directory Changes: - Move claude-plugin/ → plugins/claude-code/ - Remove hello skill (test skill no longer needed) - Remove hello.txt from root - Create plugins/README.md with structure documentation - Update marketplace.json to point to new location - Update all documentation paths - Fix context symlink for new location Structure: plugins/ └── claude-code/ # Self-contained Claude Code plugin ├── .claude-plugin/ # Plugin manifest ├── skills/ # (empty - ready for real skills) ├── agents/ # (empty - ready for agents) ├── hooks/ # (empty - ready for hooks) ├── commands/ # (empty - ready for commands) ├── context/ # Symlink to ../../.opencode/context/ └── README.md # Plugin documentation Benefits: - Self-contained plugin structure - Easy to add more IDE plugins (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) - Clean separation from main repo - No test/hello files cluttering the plugin * feat: Add Claude Code plugin (BETA) with complete OAC integration Add comprehensive Claude Code plugin bringing OpenAgents Control to Claude Code users. Features: - 6 custom subagents (task-manager, context-scout, coder-agent, test-engineer, code-reviewer, external-scout) - 9 workflow skills (using-oac, context-discovery, task-breakdown, code-execution, test-generation, code-review, external-scout, context-manager, parallel-execution) - 4 user commands (/oac:setup, /oac:help, /oac:status, /oac:cleanup) - SessionStart hook with intelligent first-time user detection - .oac configuration file support (project/global hierarchy) - Automatic .tmp cleanup with approval gates - External documentation fetching with caching - Parallel task execution support - Context pre-loading to prevent nested subagent calls - Flattened delegation hierarchy (Claude Code compatible) Architecture: - Skills orchestrate workflow and invoke subagents via context: fork - Subagents execute specialized tasks in isolated contexts - 6-stage workflow: Analyze → Discover → Plan → LoadContext → Execute → Validate → Complete - Approval gates before execution and after failures - Self-review loops in subagents for quality assurance Documentation: - Complete plugin README with architecture overview - FIRST-TIME-SETUP.md for new users (linear, step-by-step) - QUICK-START.md with all 9 skills and 4 commands - INSTALL.md with verification steps - Main README.md with BETA installation instructions Status: Production ready (Grade: A-) Total files: 33 (6 subagents, 9 skills, 4 commands, 4 scripts, 1 hook, 4 docs) Lines of code: ~6,500+ Documentation: ~4,500+ lines * feat: Add ContextManager subagent, flexible context discovery, and planning commands - Add ContextManager subagent for context file management - Add flexible context root discovery (.oac → .claude/context → context → .opencode/context) - Add /oac:plan command for easy feature planning - Add /oac:add-context command with GitHub, worktree, local, and URL support - Update ContextScout with dynamic context root discovery - Update context-manager skill to invoke subagent - Update help documentation with new commands and subagent Key features: - GitHub worktree support (key requirement) - Flexible context location discovery - Easy planning workflow - Comprehensive documentation Files added: - plugins/claude-code/agents/context-manager.md (new subagent) - plugins/claude-code/commands/oac-plan.md (new command) - plugins/claude-code/commands/oac-add-context.md (new command) - ENHANCEMENTS-SUMMARY.md (implementation summary) - CLAUDE-CODE-PLUGIN-ANALYSIS.md (gap analysis) Files modified: - plugins/claude-code/agents/context-scout.md (flexible discovery) - plugins/claude-code/commands/oac-help.md (updated docs) - plugins/claude-code/skills/context-manager/SKILL.md (subagent invocation) * fix: Restore main README and add Claude Code plugin section - Remove CLAUDE-CODE-PLUGIN-ANALYSIS.md (not needed) - Remove ENHANCEMENTS-SUMMARY.md (not needed) - Restore comprehensive README from main branch - Add Claude Code plugin section under Quick Start - Update plugin features (7 subagents, 9 skills, 6 commands) - Add flexible context discovery feature - Add /oac:plan and /oac:add-context commands --------- Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>
399 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
399 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: test-generation
|
|
description: Generate comprehensive tests following TDD principles. Use when writing tests for new features, implementing TDD workflows, or adding test coverage to existing code.
|
|
context: fork
|
|
agent: test-engineer
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Test Generation
|
|
|
|
Generate comprehensive tests following TDD principles and project testing standards.
|
|
|
|
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
|
|
Invoke this skill when:
|
|
- **After implementation**: Writing tests for newly implemented features
|
|
- **TDD workflow**: Writing tests before implementation (test-first development)
|
|
- **Coverage gaps**: Adding tests to existing code that lacks coverage
|
|
- **Regression testing**: Adding tests to prevent bugs from reoccurring
|
|
- **Refactoring**: Ensuring behavior is preserved during code changes
|
|
|
|
## How It Works
|
|
|
|
This skill runs in the **test-engineer** subagent with an isolated context. The main agent must:
|
|
|
|
1. **Pre-load testing standards** before invoking this skill
|
|
2. **Specify test requirements** clearly
|
|
3. **Review the test plan** before implementation
|
|
4. **Receive test results** and integrate them into the workflow
|
|
|
|
## Usage Pattern
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Load Testing Context (Main Agent)
|
|
|
|
Before invoking this skill, load project testing standards:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
Read these files to understand testing requirements:
|
|
- .opencode/context/core/standards/tests.md
|
|
- .opencode/context/core/standards/test-coverage.md
|
|
- [project-specific test conventions]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Invoke Test Generation
|
|
|
|
Use this skill with clear requirements:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Generate tests for [feature/component]:
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: [Brief description]
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- [Criterion 1]
|
|
- [Criterion 2]
|
|
- [Criterion 3]
|
|
|
|
**Behaviors to Test**:
|
|
1. [Behavior 1] - [expected outcome]
|
|
2. [Behavior 2] - [expected outcome]
|
|
3. [Error handling for X]
|
|
|
|
**Coverage Requirements**:
|
|
- Line coverage: [X]%
|
|
- Branch coverage: [X]%
|
|
- All critical paths tested
|
|
|
|
**Testing Standards** (pre-loaded):
|
|
- Test framework: [vitest/jest/pytest/etc.]
|
|
- Assertion library: [expect/chai/etc.]
|
|
- Mock library: [vi/jest.mock/etc.]
|
|
- File naming: [*.test.ts / *.spec.ts / test_*.py]
|
|
- Test structure: [AAA pattern required]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Review Test Plan
|
|
|
|
The test-engineer will propose a test plan:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Test Plan for [Feature]
|
|
|
|
### Behaviors to Test
|
|
1. [Behavior 1]
|
|
- ✅ Positive: [success case]
|
|
- ❌ Negative: [failure/edge case]
|
|
2. [Behavior 2]
|
|
- ✅ Positive: [success case]
|
|
- ❌ Negative: [failure/edge case]
|
|
|
|
### Mocking Strategy
|
|
- [External dependency 1]: Mock with [approach]
|
|
- [External dependency 2]: Mock with [approach]
|
|
|
|
### Coverage Target
|
|
- [X]% line coverage
|
|
- All critical paths tested
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**IMPORTANT**: Review and approve the test plan before implementation proceeds.
|
|
|
|
### Step 4: Receive Test Results
|
|
|
|
After implementation, the test-engineer returns:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
status: "success" | "failure"
|
|
tests_written: [number]
|
|
coverage:
|
|
lines: [percentage]
|
|
branches: [percentage]
|
|
functions: [percentage]
|
|
behaviors_tested:
|
|
- name: "[Behavior 1]"
|
|
positive_tests: [count]
|
|
negative_tests: [count]
|
|
test_results:
|
|
passed: [count]
|
|
failed: [count]
|
|
self_review:
|
|
positive_negative_coverage: "✅ pass"
|
|
aaa_pattern: "✅ pass"
|
|
determinism: "✅ pass"
|
|
code_quality: "✅ pass"
|
|
standards_compliance: "✅ pass"
|
|
deliverables:
|
|
- "[path/to/test/file.test.ts]"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Test Requirements Specification
|
|
|
|
### Minimal Requirements
|
|
|
|
At minimum, specify:
|
|
- **What to test**: Feature/component name and behaviors
|
|
- **Acceptance criteria**: What defines success
|
|
- **Coverage target**: Percentage or "all critical paths"
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Requirements
|
|
|
|
For best results, also specify:
|
|
- **Test framework**: vitest, jest, pytest, etc.
|
|
- **Mock patterns**: How to handle external dependencies
|
|
- **Edge cases**: Specific scenarios to cover
|
|
- **Error conditions**: Expected failure modes
|
|
|
|
### Example: Simple Feature
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Generate tests for user authentication:
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: JWT token validation middleware
|
|
|
|
**Behaviors**:
|
|
1. Valid token → allow request
|
|
2. Expired token → reject with 401
|
|
3. Invalid signature → reject with 401
|
|
4. Missing token → reject with 401
|
|
|
|
**Coverage**: All critical paths
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Example: Complex Feature
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Generate tests for payment processing service:
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: Stripe payment integration
|
|
|
|
**Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Process successful payments
|
|
- Handle declined cards gracefully
|
|
- Retry failed network requests (max 3 attempts)
|
|
- Log all payment attempts
|
|
- Emit payment events for webhooks
|
|
|
|
**Behaviors to Test**:
|
|
1. Successful payment flow
|
|
2. Declined card handling
|
|
3. Network retry logic
|
|
4. Idempotency (duplicate requests)
|
|
5. Webhook event emission
|
|
|
|
**External Dependencies** (must be mocked):
|
|
- Stripe API calls
|
|
- Database writes
|
|
- Event emitter
|
|
- Logger
|
|
|
|
**Coverage Requirements**:
|
|
- Line coverage: 90%+
|
|
- All error paths tested
|
|
- All retry scenarios tested
|
|
|
|
**Testing Standards**:
|
|
- Framework: vitest
|
|
- Mocks: vi.mock()
|
|
- Assertions: expect()
|
|
- Structure: AAA pattern
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## TDD Workflow
|
|
|
|
For test-driven development, invoke this skill **before** implementation:
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Write Tests First
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Write tests for [feature] following TDD:
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: [Description]
|
|
|
|
**Expected Behavior**:
|
|
- [Behavior 1]
|
|
- [Behavior 2]
|
|
|
|
**Note**: Implementation does not exist yet. Write tests that define the expected behavior.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Verify Tests Fail
|
|
|
|
The test-engineer will write tests and verify they fail (since implementation doesn't exist).
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Implement Feature
|
|
|
|
Use the failing tests as a specification to guide implementation.
|
|
|
|
### Step 4: Verify Tests Pass
|
|
|
|
After implementation, run tests to confirm they pass.
|
|
|
|
## What the Test-Engineer Does
|
|
|
|
The test-engineer subagent will:
|
|
|
|
1. ✅ **Review pre-loaded testing standards** (provided by main agent)
|
|
2. ✅ **Propose a test plan** with positive and negative cases
|
|
3. ✅ **Request approval** before implementing tests
|
|
4. ✅ **Implement tests** following AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)
|
|
5. ✅ **Mock all external dependencies** (network, time, file system)
|
|
6. ✅ **Run tests** and verify they pass
|
|
7. ✅ **Self-review** for quality and standards compliance
|
|
8. ✅ **Return structured results** to main agent
|
|
|
|
## What the Test-Engineer Does NOT Do
|
|
|
|
The test-engineer will NOT:
|
|
|
|
- ❌ Request additional context (main agent pre-loads standards)
|
|
- ❌ Call other subagents (returns results to main agent)
|
|
- ❌ Skip negative tests (both positive and negative required)
|
|
- ❌ Use real network calls (all external deps mocked)
|
|
- ❌ Leave flaky tests (deterministic only)
|
|
|
|
## Integration with OAC Workflow
|
|
|
|
### Stage 4: Execute (After Implementation)
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
1. Implement feature using /code-execution skill
|
|
2. Generate tests using /test-generation skill
|
|
3. Verify tests pass
|
|
4. Proceed to Stage 5: Validate
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Stage 5: Validate (Test Execution)
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
1. Run test suite
|
|
2. Verify coverage meets requirements
|
|
3. If tests fail → return to Stage 4
|
|
4. If tests pass → proceed to Stage 6
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Common Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 1: Post-Implementation Testing
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# After implementing a feature
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Generate tests for the authentication service implemented in src/auth/service.ts:
|
|
|
|
**Behaviors**: [list from acceptance criteria]
|
|
**Coverage**: 90%+
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 2: TDD (Test-First)
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Before implementing a feature
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Write tests for a new user registration endpoint (not yet implemented):
|
|
|
|
**Expected Behavior**:
|
|
- POST /api/register with valid data → 201 + user object
|
|
- POST /api/register with duplicate email → 409 error
|
|
- POST /api/register with invalid email → 400 error
|
|
|
|
**Note**: Implementation does not exist. Write tests that define expected behavior.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 3: Regression Testing
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# After fixing a bug
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Add regression tests for bug #123 (user session expiry):
|
|
|
|
**Bug**: Sessions not expiring after 24 hours
|
|
**Fix**: Added TTL check in session middleware
|
|
**Test**: Verify sessions expire correctly after 24 hours (use fake timers)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 4: Refactoring Safety
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Before refactoring
|
|
/test-generation
|
|
|
|
Generate comprehensive tests for the payment service before refactoring:
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Ensure behavior is preserved during refactoring
|
|
**Coverage**: 100% of current behavior
|
|
**Focus**: All public API methods and edge cases
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Tips for Success
|
|
|
|
1. **Pre-load context**: Always load testing standards before invoking this skill
|
|
2. **Be specific**: Clear requirements = better tests
|
|
3. **Review test plans**: Approve before implementation to catch gaps early
|
|
4. **Specify mocks**: Tell the test-engineer what external dependencies exist
|
|
5. **Define coverage**: Set clear coverage targets (percentage or "all critical paths")
|
|
6. **Use TDD**: Write tests first when possible — they guide better design
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Tests don't match project conventions
|
|
|
|
**Solution**: Ensure testing standards are pre-loaded before invoking this skill:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
Read .opencode/context/core/standards/tests.md before generating tests.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Missing edge cases
|
|
|
|
**Solution**: Specify edge cases explicitly in the requirements:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
**Edge Cases to Test**:
|
|
- Empty input
|
|
- Null values
|
|
- Extremely large inputs
|
|
- Concurrent requests
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Flaky tests
|
|
|
|
**Solution**: Specify that external dependencies must be mocked:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
**External Dependencies** (must be mocked):
|
|
- API calls to [service]
|
|
- Database queries
|
|
- Current time (use fake timers)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Insufficient coverage
|
|
|
|
**Solution**: Set explicit coverage targets:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
**Coverage Requirements**:
|
|
- Line coverage: 90%+
|
|
- Branch coverage: 85%+
|
|
- All error paths tested
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Related Skills
|
|
|
|
- `/code-execution` - Implement features before testing
|
|
- `/code-review` - Review test quality and coverage
|
|
- `/context-discovery` - Find testing standards and conventions
|
|
|
|
## Related Context
|
|
|
|
- `.opencode/context/core/standards/tests.md` - Testing standards
|
|
- `.opencode/context/core/standards/test-coverage.md` - Coverage requirements
|
|
- `.opencode/context/core/workflows/review.md` - Test review workflow
|