* feat: add OAC package refactor context file - Add comprehensive feature context for OAC package refactor - Document multi-IDE support architecture - Define community component registry (shadcn-like) - Outline flexible configuration system - Detail context file location flexibility - Define 7-phase implementation plan - Include CLI commands reference - Add community publishing guidelines * docs: add OAC refactor quick start guide - Add quick reference for Phase 1 implementation - Include project structure and file locations - Document configuration schema and defaults - Add testing strategy and validation steps - Include development workflow - Reference all related resources * feat: add critical user approval and context resolution systems CRITICAL FEATURES ADDED: 1. User Approval & YOLO Mode - Default: Interactive approval for all file operations - Always asks: local vs global install - Confirms before overwriting files - Shows diffs and file details - YOLO mode (--yolo): Skip confirmations, auto-resolve, report at end - Conflict strategies: ask, skip, overwrite, backup, yolo - Safety: backups, git detection, rollback support, audit log 2. Context Resolution System - Layered context resolution (6 priority levels) - Project override (.oac/context/) - highest priority - Project context (.opencode/context/) - IDE context (.cursor/, .claude/) - Project docs (docs/) - User global (~/.config/oac/context/) - OAC official (~/.config/oac/official/) - lowest priority - Smart resolution based on agent location (global vs local) - preferLocal config option - Context merging strategies - CLI commands for context management - Environment variable overrides - Validation and fallback support 3. Enhanced CLI Commands - All commands support --yolo, --dry-run, --local, --global - Context management: resolve, list, validate, override, sync - Detailed help and examples - Global flags for all commands This ensures users maintain full control over their projects while supporting both local and global workflows with intelligent context resolution. * feat: add component creation wizard and IDE feature parity system NEW FEATURES: 1. Interactive Component Creation - oac create (interactive wizard) - Create agents, skills, contexts, plugins, commands, tools - Template system for scaffolding - Auto-generate tests and boilerplate - Multi-IDE compatibility selection - Size optimization options 2. IDE Feature Parity & Capacity Management (CRITICAL) - Feature support matrix for all IDEs - OpenCode/Claude Code: Full support (all features) - Cursor: Limited (single file, no skills/plugins, 100KB limit) - Windsurf: Partial support - Adaptive installation based on IDE capabilities - Automatic feature filtering and warnings - Component merging for single-file IDEs (Cursor) - Capacity warnings and optimization - IDE-specific profiles 3. Enhanced CLI Commands - oac create [type] - Component creation wizard - oac templates - List available templates - oac compatibility <ide> - Check IDE compatibility - oac ides - List supported IDEs with features - oac ide info <ide> - Show IDE capabilities - oac optimize --for <ide> - Optimize for specific IDE - oac validate --ide <ide> - Validate IDE installation 4. Smart Installation - Detects IDE capabilities - Warns about unsupported features - Auto-filters components - Merges agents for Cursor - Embeds contexts for limited IDEs - Monitors file size limits - Suggests IDE-specific profiles This ensures users can easily create components and OAC gracefully handles different IDE capabilities with clear warnings and automatic optimization. * docs: add critical feedback from parallel agent review CRITICAL FINDINGS: Security Gaps (BLOCKER): - No component signing or verification - No malware/secret scanning - No permission system - Action: Add security layer in Phase 1 Missing Features (CRITICAL): - Discovery (browse, search, trending) - Lockfile for reproducibility - Version conflict management - Interactive onboarding - Progress indicators - Auto-detection for local/global Approaches to Rethink: - Context merging → Use composition instead - Always asking local/global → Auto-detect with smart defaults - Cursor agent merging → Router pattern instead Repository Structure: - Recommended: Monorepo with pnpm workspaces - Packages: core, adapters, registry, security, cli - Benefits: Shared deps, atomic commits, easier testing Community Workflow: - Component submission process - Automated security scanning - Manual review for verification - Moderation system Updated Priorities: - v1.0 MVP: Add 6 critical features (discovery, lockfile, security, etc.) - v1.1: Plugin system, workspace support, marketplace - v2.0: Enterprise features Documentation Needs: - Quick Start (5-minute guide) - CLI Reference (auto-generated) - Recipes/Cookbook - Component Creation Guide - Migration Guide Overall: Plan is 80% solid, needs 20% critical additions before Phase 1 * feat: add comprehensive agent customization and preset system CRITICAL FEATURE: Agent Customization & Personal Presets Problem: - Users want to customize agent prompts for their workflow - Users want to save personal configurations - Updates shouldn't overwrite customizations - Need easy way to view and edit agents Solution: Multi-Layer Customization System Layer 1: View Agent Configuration - oac show agent:openagent (view in pager) - oac edit agent:openagent (open in editor) - oac config show agent:openagent (config only) - oac export agent:openagent (export to file) Layer 2: Create Personal Preset - oac customize agent:openagent (create preset) - Copies to ~/.config/oac/presets/agents/ - Links to base agent for updates - Tracks customizations in metadata Layer 3: Edit Personal Preset - oac edit preset:my-openagent (edit in $EDITOR) - oac customize preset:my-openagent --interactive (wizard) - Auto-backup on save - Track modification history Layer 4: Use Personal Preset - oac use preset:my-openagent (activate) - oac use preset:my-openagent --global (set default) - oac presets list --active (show active) - Switch between presets and base agents Layer 5: Update Management (CRITICAL) - Smart update detection for base agents - Merge strategies: manual, auto-base, auto-merge, locked - Conflict resolution with user prompts - Show diffs before merging - Auto-backup before updates - Preserve user customizations by default Layer 6: Preset Sharing - oac export preset:my-openagent (export) - oac import preset ./preset.md (import) - oac share preset:my-openagent (share with team) - oac publish preset:my-openagent (publish to community) Layer 7: In-Place Editing (Advanced) - oac edit agent:openagent --in-place (risky, warns user) - Creates backup before editing - Warns that updates will overwrite - Recommends preset creation instead Update Strategies: - manual: User reviews every update - auto-base: Auto-update base, keep preset unchanged - auto-merge: Auto-merge, prompt on conflicts - locked: Never update base Configuration: - Preset metadata (.presets.json) - Update strategies per preset - Merge conflict resolution - Backup management - Warning preferences Edge Cases Handled: - In-place edits before updates - Multiple updates behind - Multiple presets for same base - Preset conflicts with IDE - Deleted base agent Best Practices: - Always create presets (safest) - Document customizations - Review updates before merging - Keep backups - Use descriptive names This ensures users can safely customize agents without fear of losing changes on updates, while still benefiting from base agent improvements. * docs: complete comprehensive user scenario analysis (16,014 lines) PLANNING PHASE COMPLETE: Documents Created (9 files, 400KB): - 00-INDEX.md (388 lines) - Planning index and overview - 01-main-plan.md (2,338 lines) - Complete feature specification - 02-quickstart-guide.md (450 lines) - Phase 1 quick reference - 03-critical-feedback.md (599 lines) - Parallel agent review - 04-solo-developer-scenarios.md (2,106 lines) - Individual workflows - 05-team-lead-scenarios.md (3,977 lines) - Team collaboration - 07-content-creator-scenarios.md (2,581 lines) - Non-technical users - 08-open-source-maintainer-scenarios.md (3,575 lines) - Community management - 09-SYNTHESIS.md (1,000+ lines) - Consolidated findings User Personas Analyzed (4/5): ✅ Solo Developer (Primary - 40% market) ✅ Team Lead (Secondary - 30% market) ✅ Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market) ✅ Open Source Maintainer (Future - 5% market) ⏸️ Enterprise Admin (Deferred to v2.0 - 5% market) Key Findings: Solo Developer (Primary User): - Setup must be < 2 minutes or they skip - Preview before committing (try mode) - Safe customization (presets) - Easy rollback/undo - Zero docs reading to start Team Lead (Secondary User): - Lockfile is non-negotiable (oac.lock) - Team configuration (oac-team.json) - Compliance monitoring (90%+ required) - Onboarding: 4-8 hours → 15 minutes (96% reduction) - Staged rollouts for updates Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market): - CLI is intimidating (need GUI wrapper) - Plain language mode (no jargon) - Visual undo (version history) - Templates and examples - Guided setup Open Source Maintainer (Future): - Security scanning pipeline (ClamAV + gitleaks) - Quality gates (70% test coverage) - Review/approval workflow - Deprecation workflow - Sustainability model Critical Additions to MVP: 1. Interactive onboarding wizard (all personas) 2. TUI browser with preview (solo dev, team lead) 3. Lockfile (oac.lock) (team lead) 4. Security scanning (all personas) 5. Try mode (solo dev) 6. Team configuration (team lead) 7. oac doctor health checks (solo dev) 8. Quality gates (maintainer) Market Opportunity: - v1.0: 70% market (solo + team) - v1.1: 90% market (+ content creators with GUI) - v2.0: 100% market (+ enterprise) Recommended Changes: - Expand MVP scope (+2 weeks, 9 weeks total) - Plan v1.1 for content creators (GUI wrapper) - Defer enterprise features to v2.0 - Build community features early (trust) Status: Ready to finalize plan and start implementation Confidence: Very High (95%+) Risk: Low (comprehensive analysis complete) * docs: add comprehensive final review of OAC planning FINAL REVIEW COMPLETE: Overall Assessment: CONDITIONAL GO ✅⚠️ Confidence Level: 85% (High, with conditions) Success Probability: 75% (with modifications) Key Strengths: ✅ Exceptional user research (16,000+ lines, 4 personas) ✅ Clear technical architecture (monorepo, TypeScript, Zod) ✅ Security-first mindset (signing, scanning, verification) ✅ Realistic scope management (v1.0 vs v1.1 vs v2.0) ✅ Comprehensive feature coverage Critical Gaps Identified: ❌ Discovery/Onboarding not in Phase 1 (but P0 in scenarios) ❌ Lockfile not in Phase 2 (but critical for teams) ❌ Security Pipeline not detailed in phases ❌ Progress UI not in Phase 1 (but needed for UX) ❌ Auto-detection not in Phase 1 (but reduces friction) Conditions for Go: 1. Add discovery/onboarding to Phase 1 (+3 days) 2. Add lockfile to Phase 2 (+2 days) 3. Add security pipeline to Phase 1 (+2 days) 4. Add progress UI to Phase 1 (+1 day) 5. Revise timeline: 7 weeks → 9 weeks Critical Action Items (6 days before Phase 1): 1. Add missing features to phases (2 days) 2. Define acceptance criteria (1 day) 3. Define testing strategy (1 day) 4. Design security pipeline (1 day) 5. Create monorepo structure (1 day) Top Risks: 🔴 Timeline Slip (70% probability, high impact) 🟡 Scope Creep (50% probability, high impact) 🟡 Context Merging Complexity (60% probability, medium impact) Recommendation: PROCEED WITH MODIFICATIONS - Complete 6 days of prerequisite work - Extend timeline to 9 weeks - Add missing features to phases - Define acceptance criteria and testing strategy Status: READY TO IMPLEMENT (with modifications) Next Steps: Complete prerequisites → Setup monorepo → Start Phase 1 * feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance - Add 77 navigation.md files across all context categories for token-efficient discovery - Standardize frontmatter format on 198+ context files (HTML comment format, 2026-02-15) - Compress 3 oversized guide files applying MVI principle (802 lines removed, 63% reduction) - Add context system analysis and planning artifacts in context-findings/ - Add task management enhancements (stage orchestration, planning subagents) - Document compression techniques and future optimization recommendations Context System Improvements: - All active directories now have navigation.md (200-300 tokens each) - 100% frontmatter compliance with priority/version/date metadata - Improved scannability through MVI compression (compact.md, organizing-context.md, creation.md) - Token efficiency increased for AI agent consumption Planning & Analysis: - Context system implementation plan and simplification analysis - ADR standard proposal and runtime permission architecture - SQLite context design for future scale (deferred until 500+ files) - Context discovery script analysis (rejected in favor of navigation-first) Task Management: - Enhanced task schema with stage orchestration support - New planning subagents (ADR, Architecture, Story Mapping, Prioritization) - Stage orchestrator for multi-stage workflow management - Session context management and lightweight handoff patterns Closes: context-simple-fixes task Ref: context-system-implementation analysis * fix: resolve markdown link validation errors in navigation files - Remove non-existent react-patterns.md link from react/navigation.md - Remove non-existent premium-dark-ui-quick-start.md link from design/navigation.md - Add skip patterns for pre-existing broken links in example/template files - Validation now passes: 215 files validated, 0 errors * fix: resolve all 119 broken markdown links across documentation - Update agent paths to new subagents structure (TestEngineer, ContextScout, etc.) - Fix animation file references (animation-ui.md → animation-components.md) - Update guide references (adding-agent.md → adding-agent-basics.md) - Convert non-existent example paths to placeholder text format - Add skip patterns for intentional example placeholders - Validation now passes: 232 files validated, 0 errors Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev> --------- Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>
6.3 KiB
Standard: Task JSON Schema
Purpose: JSON schema reference for task management files
Last Updated: 2026-02-14
Core Concepts
Task management uses two JSON file types:
task.json- Feature-level metadata and trackingsubtask_NN.json- Individual atomic tasks with dependencies
Location: .tmp/tasks/{feature-slug}/ (at project root)
Schema Versions
This document describes the base schema (v1.0) that all task files must follow.
For enhanced features (line-number precision, domain modeling, contracts, ADRs, prioritization):
- See
enhanced-task-schema.mdfor extended fields and capabilities - All enhanced fields are optional and backward compatible
- Use enhanced schema for multi-stage orchestration workflows
task.json Schema
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
id |
string | Yes | kebab-case identifier |
name |
string | Yes | Human-readable name (max 100) |
status |
enum | Yes | active / completed / blocked / archived |
objective |
string | Yes | One-line objective (max 200) |
context_files |
array | No | Standards paths only — coding conventions, patterns, security rules to follow |
reference_files |
array | No | Source material only — project files to look at (existing code, config, schemas) |
exit_criteria |
array | No | Completion conditions |
subtask_count |
int | No | Total subtasks |
completed_count |
int | No | Done subtasks |
created_at |
datetime | Yes | ISO 8601 |
completed_at |
datetime | No | ISO 8601 |
subtask_NN.json Schema
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
id |
string | Yes | {feature}-{seq} |
seq |
string | Yes | 2-digit (01, 02) |
title |
string | Yes | Task title (max 100) |
status |
enum | Yes | pending / in_progress / completed / blocked |
depends_on |
array | No | Sequence numbers of dependencies |
parallel |
bool | No | True if can run alongside others |
context_files |
array | No | Standards paths only — conventions and patterns to follow |
reference_files |
array | No | Source material only — existing files to reference |
suggested_agent |
string | No | Recommended agent for this task (e.g., OpenFrontendSpecialist) |
acceptance_criteria |
array | No | Binary pass/fail conditions |
deliverables |
array | No | Files to create/modify |
agent_id |
string | No | Set when in_progress |
started_at |
datetime | No | ISO 8601 |
completed_at |
datetime | No | ISO 8601 |
completion_summary |
string | No | What was done (max 200) |
Status Transitions
pending → in_progress (by working agent, when deps satisfied)
in_progress → completed (by TaskManager, after verification)
* → blocked (by either, when issue found)
blocked → pending (when unblocked)
Parallel Flag
parallel: true= Isolated task, can run alongside othersparallel: false= May affect shared state, run sequentially
Use task-cli.ts parallel to find all parallelizable tasks ready to run.
context_files vs reference_files — The Rule
These two fields serve fundamentally different purposes. Never mix them.
| Field | Answers | Contains | Agent behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
context_files |
"What rules do I follow?" | Standards, conventions, patterns from .opencode/context/ |
Load and apply as coding guidelines |
reference_files |
"What existing code do I look at?" | Project source files, configs, schemas | Read to understand existing patterns |
Wrong ❌ — mixing standards and source files:
"context_files": [
".opencode/context/core/standards/code-quality.md",
"package.json",
"src/existing-auth.ts"
]
Right ✅ — clean separation:
"context_files": [
".opencode/context/core/standards/code-quality.md",
".opencode/context/core/standards/security-patterns.md"
],
"reference_files": [
"package.json",
"src/existing-auth.ts"
]
Example
{
"id": "auth-system-02",
"seq": "02",
"title": "Create JWT service",
"status": "pending",
"depends_on": ["01"],
"parallel": false,
"context_files": [
".opencode/context/core/standards/code-quality.md",
".opencode/context/core/standards/security-patterns.md"
],
"reference_files": [
"src/auth/token-utils.ts"
],
"acceptance_criteria": ["JWT tokens signed with RS256", "Tests pass"],
"deliverables": ["src/auth/jwt.service.ts"]
}
Migration to Enhanced Schema
The enhanced schema adds powerful features while maintaining full backward compatibility:
When to Use Enhanced Schema
Use enhanced-task-schema.md when you need:
- Line-number precision - Point to specific sections of large files (reduces cognitive load)
- Domain modeling - Track bounded contexts, modules, vertical slices
- Contract tracking - Manage API/interface dependencies
- Design artifacts - Link Figma, wireframes, mockups
- ADR references - Connect architectural decisions to tasks
- Prioritization - RICE/WSJF scoring for release planning
Migration Path
- No changes required - Existing task files work as-is
- Gradual adoption - Add enhanced fields incrementally:
- Start with line-number precision for large context files
- Add domain fields (bounded_context, module) when modeling architecture
- Add contracts when defining APIs
- Add prioritization scores when planning releases
- Mixed formats - You can mix old and new formats in the same file
Example: Adding Line-Number Precision
Old format (still valid):
"context_files": [
".opencode/context/core/standards/code-quality.md"
]
New format (enhanced):
"context_files": [
{
"path": ".opencode/context/core/standards/code-quality.md",
"lines": "53-95",
"reason": "Pure function patterns for service layer"
}
]
Both formats work. Agents handle both automatically.
Related
enhanced-task-schema.md- Extended schema with advanced features../guides/splitting-tasks.md- How to decompose features../guides/managing-tasks.md- Lifecycle workflow../lookup/task-commands.md- CLI reference