* feat: add OAC package refactor context file - Add comprehensive feature context for OAC package refactor - Document multi-IDE support architecture - Define community component registry (shadcn-like) - Outline flexible configuration system - Detail context file location flexibility - Define 7-phase implementation plan - Include CLI commands reference - Add community publishing guidelines * docs: add OAC refactor quick start guide - Add quick reference for Phase 1 implementation - Include project structure and file locations - Document configuration schema and defaults - Add testing strategy and validation steps - Include development workflow - Reference all related resources * feat: add critical user approval and context resolution systems CRITICAL FEATURES ADDED: 1. User Approval & YOLO Mode - Default: Interactive approval for all file operations - Always asks: local vs global install - Confirms before overwriting files - Shows diffs and file details - YOLO mode (--yolo): Skip confirmations, auto-resolve, report at end - Conflict strategies: ask, skip, overwrite, backup, yolo - Safety: backups, git detection, rollback support, audit log 2. Context Resolution System - Layered context resolution (6 priority levels) - Project override (.oac/context/) - highest priority - Project context (.opencode/context/) - IDE context (.cursor/, .claude/) - Project docs (docs/) - User global (~/.config/oac/context/) - OAC official (~/.config/oac/official/) - lowest priority - Smart resolution based on agent location (global vs local) - preferLocal config option - Context merging strategies - CLI commands for context management - Environment variable overrides - Validation and fallback support 3. Enhanced CLI Commands - All commands support --yolo, --dry-run, --local, --global - Context management: resolve, list, validate, override, sync - Detailed help and examples - Global flags for all commands This ensures users maintain full control over their projects while supporting both local and global workflows with intelligent context resolution. * feat: add component creation wizard and IDE feature parity system NEW FEATURES: 1. Interactive Component Creation - oac create (interactive wizard) - Create agents, skills, contexts, plugins, commands, tools - Template system for scaffolding - Auto-generate tests and boilerplate - Multi-IDE compatibility selection - Size optimization options 2. IDE Feature Parity & Capacity Management (CRITICAL) - Feature support matrix for all IDEs - OpenCode/Claude Code: Full support (all features) - Cursor: Limited (single file, no skills/plugins, 100KB limit) - Windsurf: Partial support - Adaptive installation based on IDE capabilities - Automatic feature filtering and warnings - Component merging for single-file IDEs (Cursor) - Capacity warnings and optimization - IDE-specific profiles 3. Enhanced CLI Commands - oac create [type] - Component creation wizard - oac templates - List available templates - oac compatibility <ide> - Check IDE compatibility - oac ides - List supported IDEs with features - oac ide info <ide> - Show IDE capabilities - oac optimize --for <ide> - Optimize for specific IDE - oac validate --ide <ide> - Validate IDE installation 4. Smart Installation - Detects IDE capabilities - Warns about unsupported features - Auto-filters components - Merges agents for Cursor - Embeds contexts for limited IDEs - Monitors file size limits - Suggests IDE-specific profiles This ensures users can easily create components and OAC gracefully handles different IDE capabilities with clear warnings and automatic optimization. * docs: add critical feedback from parallel agent review CRITICAL FINDINGS: Security Gaps (BLOCKER): - No component signing or verification - No malware/secret scanning - No permission system - Action: Add security layer in Phase 1 Missing Features (CRITICAL): - Discovery (browse, search, trending) - Lockfile for reproducibility - Version conflict management - Interactive onboarding - Progress indicators - Auto-detection for local/global Approaches to Rethink: - Context merging → Use composition instead - Always asking local/global → Auto-detect with smart defaults - Cursor agent merging → Router pattern instead Repository Structure: - Recommended: Monorepo with pnpm workspaces - Packages: core, adapters, registry, security, cli - Benefits: Shared deps, atomic commits, easier testing Community Workflow: - Component submission process - Automated security scanning - Manual review for verification - Moderation system Updated Priorities: - v1.0 MVP: Add 6 critical features (discovery, lockfile, security, etc.) - v1.1: Plugin system, workspace support, marketplace - v2.0: Enterprise features Documentation Needs: - Quick Start (5-minute guide) - CLI Reference (auto-generated) - Recipes/Cookbook - Component Creation Guide - Migration Guide Overall: Plan is 80% solid, needs 20% critical additions before Phase 1 * feat: add comprehensive agent customization and preset system CRITICAL FEATURE: Agent Customization & Personal Presets Problem: - Users want to customize agent prompts for their workflow - Users want to save personal configurations - Updates shouldn't overwrite customizations - Need easy way to view and edit agents Solution: Multi-Layer Customization System Layer 1: View Agent Configuration - oac show agent:openagent (view in pager) - oac edit agent:openagent (open in editor) - oac config show agent:openagent (config only) - oac export agent:openagent (export to file) Layer 2: Create Personal Preset - oac customize agent:openagent (create preset) - Copies to ~/.config/oac/presets/agents/ - Links to base agent for updates - Tracks customizations in metadata Layer 3: Edit Personal Preset - oac edit preset:my-openagent (edit in $EDITOR) - oac customize preset:my-openagent --interactive (wizard) - Auto-backup on save - Track modification history Layer 4: Use Personal Preset - oac use preset:my-openagent (activate) - oac use preset:my-openagent --global (set default) - oac presets list --active (show active) - Switch between presets and base agents Layer 5: Update Management (CRITICAL) - Smart update detection for base agents - Merge strategies: manual, auto-base, auto-merge, locked - Conflict resolution with user prompts - Show diffs before merging - Auto-backup before updates - Preserve user customizations by default Layer 6: Preset Sharing - oac export preset:my-openagent (export) - oac import preset ./preset.md (import) - oac share preset:my-openagent (share with team) - oac publish preset:my-openagent (publish to community) Layer 7: In-Place Editing (Advanced) - oac edit agent:openagent --in-place (risky, warns user) - Creates backup before editing - Warns that updates will overwrite - Recommends preset creation instead Update Strategies: - manual: User reviews every update - auto-base: Auto-update base, keep preset unchanged - auto-merge: Auto-merge, prompt on conflicts - locked: Never update base Configuration: - Preset metadata (.presets.json) - Update strategies per preset - Merge conflict resolution - Backup management - Warning preferences Edge Cases Handled: - In-place edits before updates - Multiple updates behind - Multiple presets for same base - Preset conflicts with IDE - Deleted base agent Best Practices: - Always create presets (safest) - Document customizations - Review updates before merging - Keep backups - Use descriptive names This ensures users can safely customize agents without fear of losing changes on updates, while still benefiting from base agent improvements. * docs: complete comprehensive user scenario analysis (16,014 lines) PLANNING PHASE COMPLETE: Documents Created (9 files, 400KB): - 00-INDEX.md (388 lines) - Planning index and overview - 01-main-plan.md (2,338 lines) - Complete feature specification - 02-quickstart-guide.md (450 lines) - Phase 1 quick reference - 03-critical-feedback.md (599 lines) - Parallel agent review - 04-solo-developer-scenarios.md (2,106 lines) - Individual workflows - 05-team-lead-scenarios.md (3,977 lines) - Team collaboration - 07-content-creator-scenarios.md (2,581 lines) - Non-technical users - 08-open-source-maintainer-scenarios.md (3,575 lines) - Community management - 09-SYNTHESIS.md (1,000+ lines) - Consolidated findings User Personas Analyzed (4/5): ✅ Solo Developer (Primary - 40% market) ✅ Team Lead (Secondary - 30% market) ✅ Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market) ✅ Open Source Maintainer (Future - 5% market) ⏸️ Enterprise Admin (Deferred to v2.0 - 5% market) Key Findings: Solo Developer (Primary User): - Setup must be < 2 minutes or they skip - Preview before committing (try mode) - Safe customization (presets) - Easy rollback/undo - Zero docs reading to start Team Lead (Secondary User): - Lockfile is non-negotiable (oac.lock) - Team configuration (oac-team.json) - Compliance monitoring (90%+ required) - Onboarding: 4-8 hours → 15 minutes (96% reduction) - Staged rollouts for updates Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market): - CLI is intimidating (need GUI wrapper) - Plain language mode (no jargon) - Visual undo (version history) - Templates and examples - Guided setup Open Source Maintainer (Future): - Security scanning pipeline (ClamAV + gitleaks) - Quality gates (70% test coverage) - Review/approval workflow - Deprecation workflow - Sustainability model Critical Additions to MVP: 1. Interactive onboarding wizard (all personas) 2. TUI browser with preview (solo dev, team lead) 3. Lockfile (oac.lock) (team lead) 4. Security scanning (all personas) 5. Try mode (solo dev) 6. Team configuration (team lead) 7. oac doctor health checks (solo dev) 8. Quality gates (maintainer) Market Opportunity: - v1.0: 70% market (solo + team) - v1.1: 90% market (+ content creators with GUI) - v2.0: 100% market (+ enterprise) Recommended Changes: - Expand MVP scope (+2 weeks, 9 weeks total) - Plan v1.1 for content creators (GUI wrapper) - Defer enterprise features to v2.0 - Build community features early (trust) Status: Ready to finalize plan and start implementation Confidence: Very High (95%+) Risk: Low (comprehensive analysis complete) * docs: add comprehensive final review of OAC planning FINAL REVIEW COMPLETE: Overall Assessment: CONDITIONAL GO ✅⚠️ Confidence Level: 85% (High, with conditions) Success Probability: 75% (with modifications) Key Strengths: ✅ Exceptional user research (16,000+ lines, 4 personas) ✅ Clear technical architecture (monorepo, TypeScript, Zod) ✅ Security-first mindset (signing, scanning, verification) ✅ Realistic scope management (v1.0 vs v1.1 vs v2.0) ✅ Comprehensive feature coverage Critical Gaps Identified: ❌ Discovery/Onboarding not in Phase 1 (but P0 in scenarios) ❌ Lockfile not in Phase 2 (but critical for teams) ❌ Security Pipeline not detailed in phases ❌ Progress UI not in Phase 1 (but needed for UX) ❌ Auto-detection not in Phase 1 (but reduces friction) Conditions for Go: 1. Add discovery/onboarding to Phase 1 (+3 days) 2. Add lockfile to Phase 2 (+2 days) 3. Add security pipeline to Phase 1 (+2 days) 4. Add progress UI to Phase 1 (+1 day) 5. Revise timeline: 7 weeks → 9 weeks Critical Action Items (6 days before Phase 1): 1. Add missing features to phases (2 days) 2. Define acceptance criteria (1 day) 3. Define testing strategy (1 day) 4. Design security pipeline (1 day) 5. Create monorepo structure (1 day) Top Risks: 🔴 Timeline Slip (70% probability, high impact) 🟡 Scope Creep (50% probability, high impact) 🟡 Context Merging Complexity (60% probability, medium impact) Recommendation: PROCEED WITH MODIFICATIONS - Complete 6 days of prerequisite work - Extend timeline to 9 weeks - Add missing features to phases - Define acceptance criteria and testing strategy Status: READY TO IMPLEMENT (with modifications) Next Steps: Complete prerequisites → Setup monorepo → Start Phase 1 * feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance - Add 77 navigation.md files across all context categories for token-efficient discovery - Standardize frontmatter format on 198+ context files (HTML comment format, 2026-02-15) - Compress 3 oversized guide files applying MVI principle (802 lines removed, 63% reduction) - Add context system analysis and planning artifacts in context-findings/ - Add task management enhancements (stage orchestration, planning subagents) - Document compression techniques and future optimization recommendations Context System Improvements: - All active directories now have navigation.md (200-300 tokens each) - 100% frontmatter compliance with priority/version/date metadata - Improved scannability through MVI compression (compact.md, organizing-context.md, creation.md) - Token efficiency increased for AI agent consumption Planning & Analysis: - Context system implementation plan and simplification analysis - ADR standard proposal and runtime permission architecture - SQLite context design for future scale (deferred until 500+ files) - Context discovery script analysis (rejected in favor of navigation-first) Task Management: - Enhanced task schema with stage orchestration support - New planning subagents (ADR, Architecture, Story Mapping, Prioritization) - Stage orchestrator for multi-stage workflow management - Session context management and lightweight handoff patterns Closes: context-simple-fixes task Ref: context-system-implementation analysis * fix: resolve markdown link validation errors in navigation files - Remove non-existent react-patterns.md link from react/navigation.md - Remove non-existent premium-dark-ui-quick-start.md link from design/navigation.md - Add skip patterns for pre-existing broken links in example/template files - Validation now passes: 215 files validated, 0 errors * fix: resolve all 119 broken markdown links across documentation - Update agent paths to new subagents structure (TestEngineer, ContextScout, etc.) - Fix animation file references (animation-ui.md → animation-components.md) - Update guide references (adding-agent.md → adding-agent-basics.md) - Convert non-existent example paths to placeholder text format - Add skip patterns for intentional example placeholders - Validation now passes: 232 files validated, 0 errors Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev> --------- Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>
10 KiB
Context Harvest Operation
Purpose: Extract knowledge from AI summaries → permanent context, then clean workspace
Last Updated: 2026-01-06
Core Problem
AI agents create summary files (OVERVIEW.md, SESSION-*.md, SUMMARY.md) that contain valuable knowledge but clutter the workspace. These files "plague" the codebase.
Solution: Harvest the knowledge → permanent context, then delete the summaries.
Auto-Detection Patterns
Harvest automatically detects these patterns:Filename patterns:
- *OVERVIEW.md
- *SUMMARY.md
- SESSION-*.md
- CONTEXT-*.md
- *NOTES.md
Location patterns:
- Files in .tmp/ directory
- Files with "Summary", "Overview", "Session" in title
- Files >2KB in root directory (likely summaries)
6-Stage Workflow
Stage 1: Scan
Action: Find all summary files in workspace
Process:
- Search for auto-detection patterns
- Check .tmp/ directory
- List files with sizes
- Sort by modification date (newest first)
Output: List of candidate files
Example:
Found 3 summary documents:
1. CONTEXT-SYSTEM-OVERVIEW.md (4.2 KB, modified 1 hour ago)
2. SESSION-auth-work.md (1.8 KB, modified today)
3. .tmp/IMPLEMENTATION-NOTES.md (800 bytes, modified today)
Stage 2: Analyze
Action: Categorize content by function
Mapping Rules:
| Content Type | Target Folder | How to Identify |
|---|---|---|
| Design decisions | concepts/ |
"We decided to...", "Architecture", "Pattern" |
| Solutions/patterns | examples/ |
Code snippets, "Here's how we..." |
| Workflows | guides/ |
Numbered steps, "How to...", "Setup" |
| Errors encountered | errors/ |
Error messages, "Fixed issue", "Gotcha" |
| Reference data | lookup/ |
Tables, lists, paths, commands |
Process:
- Read each file
- Identify valuable sections (skip planning/conversation)
- Categorize by function
- Determine target file path
- Generate preview (first 60 chars)
Output: Categorized items with letter IDs
Stage 3: Approve (CRITICAL)
Action: Present approval UI with letter-based selection
ALWAYS show approval UI before extracting/deleting. NEVER auto-harvest without user confirmation.Format:
### CONTEXT-SYSTEM-OVERVIEW.md (4.2 KB)
✓ [A] Design: Function-based context organization
→ Would add to: core/concepts/context-organization.md
Preview: "Organize by function (concepts/, examples/...)..."
✓ [B] Pattern: Minimal Viable Information
→ Would add to: core/concepts/mvi-principle.md
Preview: "Extract core only (1-3 sentences), 3-5 key points..."
✓ [C] Workflow: Harvesting summary documents
→ Would create: core/guides/harvesting.md
Preview: "Scan for summaries → Extract → Approve → Delete"
✗ [D] Skip: Planning discussion notes (temporary knowledge)
---
### SESSION-auth-work.md (1.8 KB)
✓ [E] Error: JWT token expiration not handled
→ Would add to: development/errors/auth-errors.md
Preview: "Symptom: 401 after 1 hour. Cause: No refresh flow..."
✓ [F] Example: JWT refresh token implementation
→ Would create: development/examples/jwt-refresh.md
Preview: "Store refresh token → Check expiry → Request new..."
---
### .tmp/IMPLEMENTATION-NOTES.md (800 bytes)
✗ [G] Skip: Duplicate info (already in development/concepts/api-design.md)
---
**Quick options**:
- Type 'A B C E F' - Approve specific items
- Type 'all' - Approve all ✓ items (A B C E F)
- Type 'none' - Skip harvesting, delete files anyway
- Type 'cancel' - Keep files, don't harvest
Validation:
- MUST wait for user input
- MUST not proceed without approval
- If user types 'cancel', stop immediately
Output: List of approved items
Stage 4: Extract
Action: Extract and minimize approved items
Apply MVI to all extracted content: - Core concept: 1-3 sentences - Key points: 3-5 bullets - Minimal example: <10 lines - Reference link: to original source - Files: <200 lines eachProcess:
- For each approved item:
- Extract core content
- Apply MVI minimization (see compact.md)
- Generate preview of final content
- Show extraction preview (APPROVAL REQUIRED):
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Extraction Preview
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[A] → core/concepts/context-organization.md (CREATE, 45 lines)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ # Concept: Context Organization │
│ │
│ **Purpose**: Function-based knowledge organization │
│ │
│ ## Core Concept │
│ Organize context by function: concepts/, examples/... │
│ ... │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
[E] → development/errors/auth-errors.md (ADD to existing, 98 → 112 lines)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ + ## Error: JWT Token Expiration Not Handled │
│ + │
│ + **Symptom**: 401 after 1 hour │
│ + **Cause**: No refresh token flow │
│ + ... │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
... ({remaining_count} more items)
Show all? [y/n] | Approve extraction? [y/n/edit]: _
- On approval:
- Write files to disk
- Add cross-references
- Update navigation.md maps
Output: List of created/updated files
Stage 5: Cleanup (APPROVAL REQUIRED)
Action: Archive or delete source summary files
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Cleanup: Source Files
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Successfully harvested from:
CONTEXT-SYSTEM-OVERVIEW.md (4.2 KB)
SESSION-auth-work.md (1.8 KB)
Skipped (no valuable content):
.tmp/IMPLEMENTATION-NOTES.md (800 bytes)
How should we handle these source files?
1. Archive (safe) — move to .tmp/archive/harvested/{date}/
→ Can restore later if needed
2. Delete — permanently remove harvested files
→ Frees disk space, no undo
3. Keep — leave source files in place
→ No cleanup, files remain where they are
Choose [1/2/3] (default: 1): _
ONLY cleanup files that had content successfully harvested.
If extraction failed, keep the original file.
Output: Cleanup report
Stage 6: Report
Action: Show comprehensive results summary
Format:
✅ Harvested 5 items into permanent context:
- Added to core/concepts/context-organization.md
- Added to core/concepts/mvi-principle.md
- Created core/guides/harvesting.md
- Added to development/errors/auth-errors.md
- Created development/examples/jwt-refresh.md
🗑️ Cleaned up workspace:
- Archived: CONTEXT-SYSTEM-OVERVIEW.md → .tmp/archive/harvested/2026-01-06/
- Archived: SESSION-auth-work.md → .tmp/archive/harvested/2026-01-06/
- Deleted: .tmp/IMPLEMENTATION-NOTES.md (no valuable content)
📊 Updated navigation maps:
- .opencode/context/core/navigation.md
- .opencode/context/development/navigation.md
💾 Disk space freed: 6.8 KB
Usage Examples
Scan entire workspace
/context harvest
Scan specific directory
/context harvest .tmp/
/context harvest docs/sessions/
Harvest specific file
/context harvest OVERVIEW.md
/context harvest SESSION-2026-01-06.md
Smart Content Detection
✅ Extract (Valuable Knowledge)
- Design decisions ("We chose X because...")
- Patterns that worked ("This pattern solved...")
- Errors encountered + solutions
- API changes ("Updated from v1 to v2...")
- Performance findings ("Optimization reduced...")
- Core concepts explained
❌ Skip (Temporary/Noise)
- Planning discussion ("Should we...?", "Maybe try...")
- Conversational notes ("I think...", "We talked about...")
- Duplicate info (already in context)
- TODO lists (move to task system instead)
- Timestamps and session metadata
Safety Features
- Approval gate - Never auto-delete without confirmation
- Archive by default - Move to .tmp/archive/, not permanent delete
- Validation - Check file sizes, structure before committing
- Rollback - Can restore from archive if needed
- Dry run - Show what would happen before doing it
Success Criteria
After harvest operation:
- Valuable knowledge extracted to permanent context?
- All extracted files <200 lines?
- Files in correct function folders?
- navigation.md navigation updated?
- Summary files archived/deleted?
- Workspace cleaner than before?
- No knowledge lost?
Related
- compact.md - How to minimize extracted content
- mvi-principle.md - What to extract
- structure.md - Where files go
- creation.md - File creation rules