OpenWriterControle/.opencode/context/openagents-repo/guides/github-issues-workflow.md
Darren Hinde 5a40b6fdc4
feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance (#209)
* feat: add OAC package refactor context file

- Add comprehensive feature context for OAC package refactor
- Document multi-IDE support architecture
- Define community component registry (shadcn-like)
- Outline flexible configuration system
- Detail context file location flexibility
- Define 7-phase implementation plan
- Include CLI commands reference
- Add community publishing guidelines

* docs: add OAC refactor quick start guide

- Add quick reference for Phase 1 implementation
- Include project structure and file locations
- Document configuration schema and defaults
- Add testing strategy and validation steps
- Include development workflow
- Reference all related resources

* feat: add critical user approval and context resolution systems

CRITICAL FEATURES ADDED:

1. User Approval & YOLO Mode
   - Default: Interactive approval for all file operations
   - Always asks: local vs global install
   - Confirms before overwriting files
   - Shows diffs and file details
   - YOLO mode (--yolo): Skip confirmations, auto-resolve, report at end
   - Conflict strategies: ask, skip, overwrite, backup, yolo
   - Safety: backups, git detection, rollback support, audit log

2. Context Resolution System
   - Layered context resolution (6 priority levels)
   - Project override (.oac/context/) - highest priority
   - Project context (.opencode/context/)
   - IDE context (.cursor/, .claude/)
   - Project docs (docs/)
   - User global (~/.config/oac/context/)
   - OAC official (~/.config/oac/official/) - lowest priority
   - Smart resolution based on agent location (global vs local)
   - preferLocal config option
   - Context merging strategies
   - CLI commands for context management
   - Environment variable overrides
   - Validation and fallback support

3. Enhanced CLI Commands
   - All commands support --yolo, --dry-run, --local, --global
   - Context management: resolve, list, validate, override, sync
   - Detailed help and examples
   - Global flags for all commands

This ensures users maintain full control over their projects while
supporting both local and global workflows with intelligent context
resolution.

* feat: add component creation wizard and IDE feature parity system

NEW FEATURES:

1. Interactive Component Creation
   - oac create (interactive wizard)
   - Create agents, skills, contexts, plugins, commands, tools
   - Template system for scaffolding
   - Auto-generate tests and boilerplate
   - Multi-IDE compatibility selection
   - Size optimization options

2. IDE Feature Parity & Capacity Management (CRITICAL)
   - Feature support matrix for all IDEs
   - OpenCode/Claude Code: Full support (all features)
   - Cursor: Limited (single file, no skills/plugins, 100KB limit)
   - Windsurf: Partial support
   - Adaptive installation based on IDE capabilities
   - Automatic feature filtering and warnings
   - Component merging for single-file IDEs (Cursor)
   - Capacity warnings and optimization
   - IDE-specific profiles

3. Enhanced CLI Commands
   - oac create [type] - Component creation wizard
   - oac templates - List available templates
   - oac compatibility <ide> - Check IDE compatibility
   - oac ides - List supported IDEs with features
   - oac ide info <ide> - Show IDE capabilities
   - oac optimize --for <ide> - Optimize for specific IDE
   - oac validate --ide <ide> - Validate IDE installation

4. Smart Installation
   - Detects IDE capabilities
   - Warns about unsupported features
   - Auto-filters components
   - Merges agents for Cursor
   - Embeds contexts for limited IDEs
   - Monitors file size limits
   - Suggests IDE-specific profiles

This ensures users can easily create components and OAC gracefully
handles different IDE capabilities with clear warnings and automatic
optimization.

* docs: add critical feedback from parallel agent review

CRITICAL FINDINGS:

Security Gaps (BLOCKER):
- No component signing or verification
- No malware/secret scanning
- No permission system
- Action: Add security layer in Phase 1

Missing Features (CRITICAL):
- Discovery (browse, search, trending)
- Lockfile for reproducibility
- Version conflict management
- Interactive onboarding
- Progress indicators
- Auto-detection for local/global

Approaches to Rethink:
- Context merging → Use composition instead
- Always asking local/global → Auto-detect with smart defaults
- Cursor agent merging → Router pattern instead

Repository Structure:
- Recommended: Monorepo with pnpm workspaces
- Packages: core, adapters, registry, security, cli
- Benefits: Shared deps, atomic commits, easier testing

Community Workflow:
- Component submission process
- Automated security scanning
- Manual review for verification
- Moderation system

Updated Priorities:
- v1.0 MVP: Add 6 critical features (discovery, lockfile, security, etc.)
- v1.1: Plugin system, workspace support, marketplace
- v2.0: Enterprise features

Documentation Needs:
- Quick Start (5-minute guide)
- CLI Reference (auto-generated)
- Recipes/Cookbook
- Component Creation Guide
- Migration Guide

Overall: Plan is 80% solid, needs 20% critical additions before Phase 1

* feat: add comprehensive agent customization and preset system

CRITICAL FEATURE: Agent Customization & Personal Presets

Problem:
- Users want to customize agent prompts for their workflow
- Users want to save personal configurations
- Updates shouldn't overwrite customizations
- Need easy way to view and edit agents

Solution: Multi-Layer Customization System

Layer 1: View Agent Configuration
- oac show agent:openagent (view in pager)
- oac edit agent:openagent (open in editor)
- oac config show agent:openagent (config only)
- oac export agent:openagent (export to file)

Layer 2: Create Personal Preset
- oac customize agent:openagent (create preset)
- Copies to ~/.config/oac/presets/agents/
- Links to base agent for updates
- Tracks customizations in metadata

Layer 3: Edit Personal Preset
- oac edit preset:my-openagent (edit in $EDITOR)
- oac customize preset:my-openagent --interactive (wizard)
- Auto-backup on save
- Track modification history

Layer 4: Use Personal Preset
- oac use preset:my-openagent (activate)
- oac use preset:my-openagent --global (set default)
- oac presets list --active (show active)
- Switch between presets and base agents

Layer 5: Update Management (CRITICAL)
- Smart update detection for base agents
- Merge strategies: manual, auto-base, auto-merge, locked
- Conflict resolution with user prompts
- Show diffs before merging
- Auto-backup before updates
- Preserve user customizations by default

Layer 6: Preset Sharing
- oac export preset:my-openagent (export)
- oac import preset ./preset.md (import)
- oac share preset:my-openagent (share with team)
- oac publish preset:my-openagent (publish to community)

Layer 7: In-Place Editing (Advanced)
- oac edit agent:openagent --in-place (risky, warns user)
- Creates backup before editing
- Warns that updates will overwrite
- Recommends preset creation instead

Update Strategies:
- manual: User reviews every update
- auto-base: Auto-update base, keep preset unchanged
- auto-merge: Auto-merge, prompt on conflicts
- locked: Never update base

Configuration:
- Preset metadata (.presets.json)
- Update strategies per preset
- Merge conflict resolution
- Backup management
- Warning preferences

Edge Cases Handled:
- In-place edits before updates
- Multiple updates behind
- Multiple presets for same base
- Preset conflicts with IDE
- Deleted base agent

Best Practices:
- Always create presets (safest)
- Document customizations
- Review updates before merging
- Keep backups
- Use descriptive names

This ensures users can safely customize agents without fear of
losing changes on updates, while still benefiting from base agent
improvements.

* docs: complete comprehensive user scenario analysis (16,014 lines)

PLANNING PHASE COMPLETE:

Documents Created (9 files, 400KB):
- 00-INDEX.md (388 lines) - Planning index and overview
- 01-main-plan.md (2,338 lines) - Complete feature specification
- 02-quickstart-guide.md (450 lines) - Phase 1 quick reference
- 03-critical-feedback.md (599 lines) - Parallel agent review
- 04-solo-developer-scenarios.md (2,106 lines) - Individual workflows
- 05-team-lead-scenarios.md (3,977 lines) - Team collaboration
- 07-content-creator-scenarios.md (2,581 lines) - Non-technical users
- 08-open-source-maintainer-scenarios.md (3,575 lines) - Community management
- 09-SYNTHESIS.md (1,000+ lines) - Consolidated findings

User Personas Analyzed (4/5):
✅ Solo Developer (Primary - 40% market)
✅ Team Lead (Secondary - 30% market)
✅ Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market)
✅ Open Source Maintainer (Future - 5% market)
⏸️ Enterprise Admin (Deferred to v2.0 - 5% market)

Key Findings:

Solo Developer (Primary User):
- Setup must be < 2 minutes or they skip
- Preview before committing (try mode)
- Safe customization (presets)
- Easy rollback/undo
- Zero docs reading to start

Team Lead (Secondary User):
- Lockfile is non-negotiable (oac.lock)
- Team configuration (oac-team.json)
- Compliance monitoring (90%+ required)
- Onboarding: 4-8 hours → 15 minutes (96% reduction)
- Staged rollouts for updates

Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market):
- CLI is intimidating (need GUI wrapper)
- Plain language mode (no jargon)
- Visual undo (version history)
- Templates and examples
- Guided setup

Open Source Maintainer (Future):
- Security scanning pipeline (ClamAV + gitleaks)
- Quality gates (70% test coverage)
- Review/approval workflow
- Deprecation workflow
- Sustainability model

Critical Additions to MVP:
1. Interactive onboarding wizard (all personas)
2. TUI browser with preview (solo dev, team lead)
3. Lockfile (oac.lock) (team lead)
4. Security scanning (all personas)
5. Try mode (solo dev)
6. Team configuration (team lead)
7. oac doctor health checks (solo dev)
8. Quality gates (maintainer)

Market Opportunity:
- v1.0: 70% market (solo + team)
- v1.1: 90% market (+ content creators with GUI)
- v2.0: 100% market (+ enterprise)

Recommended Changes:
- Expand MVP scope (+2 weeks, 9 weeks total)
- Plan v1.1 for content creators (GUI wrapper)
- Defer enterprise features to v2.0
- Build community features early (trust)

Status: Ready to finalize plan and start implementation
Confidence: Very High (95%+)
Risk: Low (comprehensive analysis complete)

* docs: add comprehensive final review of OAC planning

FINAL REVIEW COMPLETE:

Overall Assessment: CONDITIONAL GO ✅⚠️
Confidence Level: 85% (High, with conditions)
Success Probability: 75% (with modifications)

Key Strengths:
✅ Exceptional user research (16,000+ lines, 4 personas)
✅ Clear technical architecture (monorepo, TypeScript, Zod)
✅ Security-first mindset (signing, scanning, verification)
✅ Realistic scope management (v1.0 vs v1.1 vs v2.0)
✅ Comprehensive feature coverage

Critical Gaps Identified:
❌ Discovery/Onboarding not in Phase 1 (but P0 in scenarios)
❌ Lockfile not in Phase 2 (but critical for teams)
❌ Security Pipeline not detailed in phases
❌ Progress UI not in Phase 1 (but needed for UX)
❌ Auto-detection not in Phase 1 (but reduces friction)

Conditions for Go:
1. Add discovery/onboarding to Phase 1 (+3 days)
2. Add lockfile to Phase 2 (+2 days)
3. Add security pipeline to Phase 1 (+2 days)
4. Add progress UI to Phase 1 (+1 day)
5. Revise timeline: 7 weeks → 9 weeks

Critical Action Items (6 days before Phase 1):
1. Add missing features to phases (2 days)
2. Define acceptance criteria (1 day)
3. Define testing strategy (1 day)
4. Design security pipeline (1 day)
5. Create monorepo structure (1 day)

Top Risks:
🔴 Timeline Slip (70% probability, high impact)
🟡 Scope Creep (50% probability, high impact)
🟡 Context Merging Complexity (60% probability, medium impact)

Recommendation: PROCEED WITH MODIFICATIONS
- Complete 6 days of prerequisite work
- Extend timeline to 9 weeks
- Add missing features to phases
- Define acceptance criteria and testing strategy

Status: READY TO IMPLEMENT (with modifications)
Next Steps: Complete prerequisites → Setup monorepo → Start Phase 1

* feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance

- Add 77 navigation.md files across all context categories for token-efficient discovery
- Standardize frontmatter format on 198+ context files (HTML comment format, 2026-02-15)
- Compress 3 oversized guide files applying MVI principle (802 lines removed, 63% reduction)
- Add context system analysis and planning artifacts in context-findings/
- Add task management enhancements (stage orchestration, planning subagents)
- Document compression techniques and future optimization recommendations

Context System Improvements:
- All active directories now have navigation.md (200-300 tokens each)
- 100% frontmatter compliance with priority/version/date metadata
- Improved scannability through MVI compression (compact.md, organizing-context.md, creation.md)
- Token efficiency increased for AI agent consumption

Planning & Analysis:
- Context system implementation plan and simplification analysis
- ADR standard proposal and runtime permission architecture
- SQLite context design for future scale (deferred until 500+ files)
- Context discovery script analysis (rejected in favor of navigation-first)

Task Management:
- Enhanced task schema with stage orchestration support
- New planning subagents (ADR, Architecture, Story Mapping, Prioritization)
- Stage orchestrator for multi-stage workflow management
- Session context management and lightweight handoff patterns

Closes: context-simple-fixes task
Ref: context-system-implementation analysis

* fix: resolve markdown link validation errors in navigation files

- Remove non-existent react-patterns.md link from react/navigation.md
- Remove non-existent premium-dark-ui-quick-start.md link from design/navigation.md
- Add skip patterns for pre-existing broken links in example/template files
- Validation now passes: 215 files validated, 0 errors

* fix: resolve all 119 broken markdown links across documentation

- Update agent paths to new subagents structure (TestEngineer, ContextScout, etc.)
- Fix animation file references (animation-ui.md → animation-components.md)
- Update guide references (adding-agent.md → adding-agent-basics.md)
- Convert non-existent example paths to placeholder text format
- Add skip patterns for intentional example placeholders
- Validation now passes: 232 files validated, 0 errors

Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>

---------

Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>
2026-02-15 23:01:19 +00:00

9.7 KiB

Guide: GitHub Issues and Project Board Workflow

Prerequisites: Basic understanding of GitHub issues and projects
Purpose: Step-by-step workflow for managing issues and project board


Overview

This guide covers how to work with GitHub issues and the project board to track and process different requests, features, and improvements.

Project Board: https://github.com/users/darrenhinde/projects/2/views/2

Time: Varies by task


Quick Commands Reference

# List issues
gh issue list --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl

# Create issue
gh issue create --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl --title "Title" --body "Body" --label "label1,label2"

# Add issue to project
gh project item-add 2 --owner darrenhinde --url https://github.com/darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl/issues/NUMBER

# View issue
gh issue view NUMBER --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl

# Update issue
gh issue edit NUMBER --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl --add-label "new-label"

# Close issue
gh issue close NUMBER --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl

Step 1: Creating Issues

Issue Types

Feature Request

  • Labels: feature, enhancement
  • Include: Goals, key features, success criteria
  • Template: See "Feature Issue Template" below

Bug Report

  • Labels: bug
  • Include: Steps to reproduce, expected vs actual behavior
  • Template: See "Bug Issue Template" below

Improvement

  • Labels: enhancement, framework
  • Include: Current state, proposed improvement, impact

Question

  • Labels: question
  • Include: Context, specific question, use case

Priority Labels

  • priority-high - Critical, blocking work
  • priority-medium - Important, not blocking
  • priority-low - Nice to have

Category Labels

  • agents - Agent system related
  • framework - Core framework changes
  • evals - Evaluation framework
  • idea - High-level proposal

Creating an Issue

# Basic issue
gh issue create \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --title "Add new feature X" \
  --body "Description of feature" \
  --label "feature,priority-medium"

# Feature with detailed body
gh issue create \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --title "Build plugin system" \
  --label "feature,framework,priority-high" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Overview
Brief description

## Goals
- Goal 1
- Goal 2

## Key Features
- Feature 1
- Feature 2

## Success Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
EOF
)"

Step 2: Adding Issues to Project Board

Add Single Issue

# Add issue to project
gh project item-add 2 \
  --owner darrenhinde \
  --url https://github.com/darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl/issues/NUMBER

Add Multiple Issues

# Add issues 137-142 to project
for i in {137..142}; do
  gh project item-add 2 \
    --owner darrenhinde \
    --url https://github.com/darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl/issues/$i
done

Verify Issues on Board

# View project items
gh project item-list 2 --owner darrenhinde --format json | jq '.items[] | {title, status}'

Step 3: Processing Issues

Workflow States

  1. Backlog - New issues, not yet prioritized
  2. Todo - Prioritized, ready to work on
  3. In Progress - Currently being worked on
  4. In Review - PR submitted, awaiting review
  5. Done - Completed and merged

Moving Issues

# Update issue status (via project board UI or gh CLI)
# Note: Status updates are typically done via web UI

Assigning Issues

# Assign to yourself
gh issue edit NUMBER \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --add-assignee @me

# Assign to someone else
gh issue edit NUMBER \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --add-assignee username

Step 4: Working on Issues

Start Work

  1. Assign issue to yourself

    gh issue edit NUMBER --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl --add-assignee @me
    
  2. Move to "In Progress" (via web UI)

  3. Create branch (optional)

    git checkout -b feature/issue-NUMBER-description
    
  4. Reference issue in commits

    git commit -m "feat: implement X (#NUMBER)"
    

Update Progress

# Add comment to issue
gh issue comment NUMBER \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --body "Progress update: Completed X, working on Y"

Complete Work

  1. Create PR

    gh pr create \
      --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
      --title "Fix #NUMBER: Description" \
      --body "Closes #NUMBER\n\nChanges:\n- Change 1\n- Change 2"
    
  2. Move to "In Review" (via web UI)

  3. After merge, issue auto-closes (if PR uses "Closes #NUMBER")


Step 5: Using Issues for Request Processing

Request Types

User Feature Request

  1. Create issue with feature label
  2. Add to project board
  3. Prioritize based on impact
  4. Break down into subtasks if needed
  5. Assign to appropriate person/team

Bug Report

  1. Create issue with bug label
  2. Add reproduction steps
  3. Prioritize based on severity
  4. Assign for investigation
  5. Link to related issues if applicable

Improvement Suggestion

  1. Create issue with enhancement label
  2. Discuss approach in comments
  3. Get consensus before implementation
  4. Create implementation plan
  5. Execute and track progress

Breaking Down Large Issues

For complex features, create parent issue and subtasks:

# Parent issue
gh issue create \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --title "[EPIC] Plugin System" \
  --label "feature,framework,priority-high" \
  --body "Parent issue for plugin system work"

# Subtask issues
gh issue create \
  --repo darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl \
  --title "Plugin manifest system" \
  --label "feature" \
  --body "Part of #PARENT_NUMBER\n\nImplement plugin.json manifest"

Step 6: Issue Templates

Feature Issue Template

## Overview
Brief description of the feature

## Goals
- Goal 1
- Goal 2
- Goal 3

## Key Features
- Feature 1
- Feature 2
- Feature 3

## Related Issues
- #123 (related issue)

## Success Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
- [ ] Criterion 3

Bug Issue Template

## Description
Brief description of the bug

## Steps to Reproduce
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3

## Expected Behavior
What should happen

## Actual Behavior
What actually happens

## Environment
- OS: macOS/Linux/Windows
- Version: 0.5.2
- Node: v20.x

## Additional Context
Any other relevant information

Improvement Issue Template

## Current State
Description of current implementation

## Proposed Improvement
What should be improved and why

## Impact
- Performance improvement
- Developer experience
- User experience

## Implementation Approach
High-level approach to implementation

## Success Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2

Step 7: Automation and Integration

Auto-Close Issues

Use keywords in PR descriptions:

  • Closes #123
  • Fixes #123
  • Resolves #123
# In PR description
gh pr create \
  --title "Add feature X" \
  --body "Implements #123\n\nChanges:\n- Change 1"

Issue References in Commits

# Reference issue in commit
git commit -m "feat: add plugin system (#137)"

# Close issue in commit
git commit -m "fix: resolve permission error (closes #140)"

Best Practices

Issue Creation

✅ Clear titles - Descriptive and specific
✅ Detailed descriptions - Include context and goals
✅ Proper labels - Use consistent labeling
✅ Success criteria - Define what "done" means
✅ Link related issues - Show dependencies

Issue Management

✅ Regular triage - Review and prioritize weekly
✅ Keep updated - Add comments on progress
✅ Close stale issues - Clean up old/irrelevant issues
✅ Use milestones - Group related issues
✅ Assign owners - Clear responsibility

Project Board

✅ Update status - Keep board current
✅ Limit WIP - Don't overload "In Progress"
✅ Review regularly - Weekly board review
✅ Archive completed - Keep board clean


Common Workflows

Processing User Request

  1. Receive request (via issue, email, chat)
  2. Create issue with appropriate labels
  3. Add to project board
  4. Triage and prioritize
  5. Assign to team member
  6. Track progress via status updates
  7. Review and merge PR
  8. Close issue and notify requester

Planning New Feature

  1. Create epic issue for overall feature
  2. Break down into subtasks
  3. Add all to project board
  4. Prioritize subtasks
  5. Assign to team members
  6. Track progress across subtasks
  7. Complete and close when all subtasks done

Bug Triage

  1. Create bug issue with reproduction steps
  2. Label with severity (critical, high, medium, low)
  3. Add to project board
  4. Assign for investigation
  5. Reproduce and diagnose
  6. Fix and test
  7. Create PR with fix
  8. Close issue after merge

Checklist

Before closing an issue:

  • All success criteria met
  • Tests passing
  • Documentation updated
  • PR merged (if applicable)
  • Related issues updated
  • Stakeholders notified

  • Registry guide: guides/updating-registry.md
  • Release guide: guides/creating-release.md
  • Testing guide: guides/testing-agent.md
  • Debugging: guides/debugging.md

External Resources


Last Updated: 2026-01-30
Version: 0.5.2