OpenWriterControle/.opencode/context/development/frontend/when-to-delegate.md
Darren Hinde 5a40b6fdc4
feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance (#209)
* feat: add OAC package refactor context file

- Add comprehensive feature context for OAC package refactor
- Document multi-IDE support architecture
- Define community component registry (shadcn-like)
- Outline flexible configuration system
- Detail context file location flexibility
- Define 7-phase implementation plan
- Include CLI commands reference
- Add community publishing guidelines

* docs: add OAC refactor quick start guide

- Add quick reference for Phase 1 implementation
- Include project structure and file locations
- Document configuration schema and defaults
- Add testing strategy and validation steps
- Include development workflow
- Reference all related resources

* feat: add critical user approval and context resolution systems

CRITICAL FEATURES ADDED:

1. User Approval & YOLO Mode
   - Default: Interactive approval for all file operations
   - Always asks: local vs global install
   - Confirms before overwriting files
   - Shows diffs and file details
   - YOLO mode (--yolo): Skip confirmations, auto-resolve, report at end
   - Conflict strategies: ask, skip, overwrite, backup, yolo
   - Safety: backups, git detection, rollback support, audit log

2. Context Resolution System
   - Layered context resolution (6 priority levels)
   - Project override (.oac/context/) - highest priority
   - Project context (.opencode/context/)
   - IDE context (.cursor/, .claude/)
   - Project docs (docs/)
   - User global (~/.config/oac/context/)
   - OAC official (~/.config/oac/official/) - lowest priority
   - Smart resolution based on agent location (global vs local)
   - preferLocal config option
   - Context merging strategies
   - CLI commands for context management
   - Environment variable overrides
   - Validation and fallback support

3. Enhanced CLI Commands
   - All commands support --yolo, --dry-run, --local, --global
   - Context management: resolve, list, validate, override, sync
   - Detailed help and examples
   - Global flags for all commands

This ensures users maintain full control over their projects while
supporting both local and global workflows with intelligent context
resolution.

* feat: add component creation wizard and IDE feature parity system

NEW FEATURES:

1. Interactive Component Creation
   - oac create (interactive wizard)
   - Create agents, skills, contexts, plugins, commands, tools
   - Template system for scaffolding
   - Auto-generate tests and boilerplate
   - Multi-IDE compatibility selection
   - Size optimization options

2. IDE Feature Parity & Capacity Management (CRITICAL)
   - Feature support matrix for all IDEs
   - OpenCode/Claude Code: Full support (all features)
   - Cursor: Limited (single file, no skills/plugins, 100KB limit)
   - Windsurf: Partial support
   - Adaptive installation based on IDE capabilities
   - Automatic feature filtering and warnings
   - Component merging for single-file IDEs (Cursor)
   - Capacity warnings and optimization
   - IDE-specific profiles

3. Enhanced CLI Commands
   - oac create [type] - Component creation wizard
   - oac templates - List available templates
   - oac compatibility <ide> - Check IDE compatibility
   - oac ides - List supported IDEs with features
   - oac ide info <ide> - Show IDE capabilities
   - oac optimize --for <ide> - Optimize for specific IDE
   - oac validate --ide <ide> - Validate IDE installation

4. Smart Installation
   - Detects IDE capabilities
   - Warns about unsupported features
   - Auto-filters components
   - Merges agents for Cursor
   - Embeds contexts for limited IDEs
   - Monitors file size limits
   - Suggests IDE-specific profiles

This ensures users can easily create components and OAC gracefully
handles different IDE capabilities with clear warnings and automatic
optimization.

* docs: add critical feedback from parallel agent review

CRITICAL FINDINGS:

Security Gaps (BLOCKER):
- No component signing or verification
- No malware/secret scanning
- No permission system
- Action: Add security layer in Phase 1

Missing Features (CRITICAL):
- Discovery (browse, search, trending)
- Lockfile for reproducibility
- Version conflict management
- Interactive onboarding
- Progress indicators
- Auto-detection for local/global

Approaches to Rethink:
- Context merging → Use composition instead
- Always asking local/global → Auto-detect with smart defaults
- Cursor agent merging → Router pattern instead

Repository Structure:
- Recommended: Monorepo with pnpm workspaces
- Packages: core, adapters, registry, security, cli
- Benefits: Shared deps, atomic commits, easier testing

Community Workflow:
- Component submission process
- Automated security scanning
- Manual review for verification
- Moderation system

Updated Priorities:
- v1.0 MVP: Add 6 critical features (discovery, lockfile, security, etc.)
- v1.1: Plugin system, workspace support, marketplace
- v2.0: Enterprise features

Documentation Needs:
- Quick Start (5-minute guide)
- CLI Reference (auto-generated)
- Recipes/Cookbook
- Component Creation Guide
- Migration Guide

Overall: Plan is 80% solid, needs 20% critical additions before Phase 1

* feat: add comprehensive agent customization and preset system

CRITICAL FEATURE: Agent Customization & Personal Presets

Problem:
- Users want to customize agent prompts for their workflow
- Users want to save personal configurations
- Updates shouldn't overwrite customizations
- Need easy way to view and edit agents

Solution: Multi-Layer Customization System

Layer 1: View Agent Configuration
- oac show agent:openagent (view in pager)
- oac edit agent:openagent (open in editor)
- oac config show agent:openagent (config only)
- oac export agent:openagent (export to file)

Layer 2: Create Personal Preset
- oac customize agent:openagent (create preset)
- Copies to ~/.config/oac/presets/agents/
- Links to base agent for updates
- Tracks customizations in metadata

Layer 3: Edit Personal Preset
- oac edit preset:my-openagent (edit in $EDITOR)
- oac customize preset:my-openagent --interactive (wizard)
- Auto-backup on save
- Track modification history

Layer 4: Use Personal Preset
- oac use preset:my-openagent (activate)
- oac use preset:my-openagent --global (set default)
- oac presets list --active (show active)
- Switch between presets and base agents

Layer 5: Update Management (CRITICAL)
- Smart update detection for base agents
- Merge strategies: manual, auto-base, auto-merge, locked
- Conflict resolution with user prompts
- Show diffs before merging
- Auto-backup before updates
- Preserve user customizations by default

Layer 6: Preset Sharing
- oac export preset:my-openagent (export)
- oac import preset ./preset.md (import)
- oac share preset:my-openagent (share with team)
- oac publish preset:my-openagent (publish to community)

Layer 7: In-Place Editing (Advanced)
- oac edit agent:openagent --in-place (risky, warns user)
- Creates backup before editing
- Warns that updates will overwrite
- Recommends preset creation instead

Update Strategies:
- manual: User reviews every update
- auto-base: Auto-update base, keep preset unchanged
- auto-merge: Auto-merge, prompt on conflicts
- locked: Never update base

Configuration:
- Preset metadata (.presets.json)
- Update strategies per preset
- Merge conflict resolution
- Backup management
- Warning preferences

Edge Cases Handled:
- In-place edits before updates
- Multiple updates behind
- Multiple presets for same base
- Preset conflicts with IDE
- Deleted base agent

Best Practices:
- Always create presets (safest)
- Document customizations
- Review updates before merging
- Keep backups
- Use descriptive names

This ensures users can safely customize agents without fear of
losing changes on updates, while still benefiting from base agent
improvements.

* docs: complete comprehensive user scenario analysis (16,014 lines)

PLANNING PHASE COMPLETE:

Documents Created (9 files, 400KB):
- 00-INDEX.md (388 lines) - Planning index and overview
- 01-main-plan.md (2,338 lines) - Complete feature specification
- 02-quickstart-guide.md (450 lines) - Phase 1 quick reference
- 03-critical-feedback.md (599 lines) - Parallel agent review
- 04-solo-developer-scenarios.md (2,106 lines) - Individual workflows
- 05-team-lead-scenarios.md (3,977 lines) - Team collaboration
- 07-content-creator-scenarios.md (2,581 lines) - Non-technical users
- 08-open-source-maintainer-scenarios.md (3,575 lines) - Community management
- 09-SYNTHESIS.md (1,000+ lines) - Consolidated findings

User Personas Analyzed (4/5):
✅ Solo Developer (Primary - 40% market)
✅ Team Lead (Secondary - 30% market)
✅ Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market)
✅ Open Source Maintainer (Future - 5% market)
⏸️ Enterprise Admin (Deferred to v2.0 - 5% market)

Key Findings:

Solo Developer (Primary User):
- Setup must be < 2 minutes or they skip
- Preview before committing (try mode)
- Safe customization (presets)
- Easy rollback/undo
- Zero docs reading to start

Team Lead (Secondary User):
- Lockfile is non-negotiable (oac.lock)
- Team configuration (oac-team.json)
- Compliance monitoring (90%+ required)
- Onboarding: 4-8 hours → 15 minutes (96% reduction)
- Staged rollouts for updates

Content Creator (Emerging - 20% market):
- CLI is intimidating (need GUI wrapper)
- Plain language mode (no jargon)
- Visual undo (version history)
- Templates and examples
- Guided setup

Open Source Maintainer (Future):
- Security scanning pipeline (ClamAV + gitleaks)
- Quality gates (70% test coverage)
- Review/approval workflow
- Deprecation workflow
- Sustainability model

Critical Additions to MVP:
1. Interactive onboarding wizard (all personas)
2. TUI browser with preview (solo dev, team lead)
3. Lockfile (oac.lock) (team lead)
4. Security scanning (all personas)
5. Try mode (solo dev)
6. Team configuration (team lead)
7. oac doctor health checks (solo dev)
8. Quality gates (maintainer)

Market Opportunity:
- v1.0: 70% market (solo + team)
- v1.1: 90% market (+ content creators with GUI)
- v2.0: 100% market (+ enterprise)

Recommended Changes:
- Expand MVP scope (+2 weeks, 9 weeks total)
- Plan v1.1 for content creators (GUI wrapper)
- Defer enterprise features to v2.0
- Build community features early (trust)

Status: Ready to finalize plan and start implementation
Confidence: Very High (95%+)
Risk: Low (comprehensive analysis complete)

* docs: add comprehensive final review of OAC planning

FINAL REVIEW COMPLETE:

Overall Assessment: CONDITIONAL GO ✅⚠️
Confidence Level: 85% (High, with conditions)
Success Probability: 75% (with modifications)

Key Strengths:
✅ Exceptional user research (16,000+ lines, 4 personas)
✅ Clear technical architecture (monorepo, TypeScript, Zod)
✅ Security-first mindset (signing, scanning, verification)
✅ Realistic scope management (v1.0 vs v1.1 vs v2.0)
✅ Comprehensive feature coverage

Critical Gaps Identified:
❌ Discovery/Onboarding not in Phase 1 (but P0 in scenarios)
❌ Lockfile not in Phase 2 (but critical for teams)
❌ Security Pipeline not detailed in phases
❌ Progress UI not in Phase 1 (but needed for UX)
❌ Auto-detection not in Phase 1 (but reduces friction)

Conditions for Go:
1. Add discovery/onboarding to Phase 1 (+3 days)
2. Add lockfile to Phase 2 (+2 days)
3. Add security pipeline to Phase 1 (+2 days)
4. Add progress UI to Phase 1 (+1 day)
5. Revise timeline: 7 weeks → 9 weeks

Critical Action Items (6 days before Phase 1):
1. Add missing features to phases (2 days)
2. Define acceptance criteria (1 day)
3. Define testing strategy (1 day)
4. Design security pipeline (1 day)
5. Create monorepo structure (1 day)

Top Risks:
🔴 Timeline Slip (70% probability, high impact)
🟡 Scope Creep (50% probability, high impact)
🟡 Context Merging Complexity (60% probability, medium impact)

Recommendation: PROCEED WITH MODIFICATIONS
- Complete 6 days of prerequisite work
- Extend timeline to 9 weeks
- Add missing features to phases
- Define acceptance criteria and testing strategy

Status: READY TO IMPLEMENT (with modifications)
Next Steps: Complete prerequisites → Setup monorepo → Start Phase 1

* feat(context): Standardize context system with navigation, frontmatter, and MVI compliance

- Add 77 navigation.md files across all context categories for token-efficient discovery
- Standardize frontmatter format on 198+ context files (HTML comment format, 2026-02-15)
- Compress 3 oversized guide files applying MVI principle (802 lines removed, 63% reduction)
- Add context system analysis and planning artifacts in context-findings/
- Add task management enhancements (stage orchestration, planning subagents)
- Document compression techniques and future optimization recommendations

Context System Improvements:
- All active directories now have navigation.md (200-300 tokens each)
- 100% frontmatter compliance with priority/version/date metadata
- Improved scannability through MVI compression (compact.md, organizing-context.md, creation.md)
- Token efficiency increased for AI agent consumption

Planning & Analysis:
- Context system implementation plan and simplification analysis
- ADR standard proposal and runtime permission architecture
- SQLite context design for future scale (deferred until 500+ files)
- Context discovery script analysis (rejected in favor of navigation-first)

Task Management:
- Enhanced task schema with stage orchestration support
- New planning subagents (ADR, Architecture, Story Mapping, Prioritization)
- Stage orchestrator for multi-stage workflow management
- Session context management and lightweight handoff patterns

Closes: context-simple-fixes task
Ref: context-system-implementation analysis

* fix: resolve markdown link validation errors in navigation files

- Remove non-existent react-patterns.md link from react/navigation.md
- Remove non-existent premium-dark-ui-quick-start.md link from design/navigation.md
- Add skip patterns for pre-existing broken links in example/template files
- Validation now passes: 215 files validated, 0 errors

* fix: resolve all 119 broken markdown links across documentation

- Update agent paths to new subagents structure (TestEngineer, ContextScout, etc.)
- Fix animation file references (animation-ui.md → animation-components.md)
- Update guide references (adding-agent.md → adding-agent-basics.md)
- Convert non-existent example paths to placeholder text format
- Add skip patterns for intentional example placeholders
- Validation now passes: 232 files validated, 0 errors

Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>

---------

Co-authored-by: CoderAgent <coder@openagents.dev>
2026-02-15 23:01:19 +00:00

14 KiB

When to Delegate to Frontend Specialist

Overview

Clear decision criteria for when to delegate frontend/UI work to the frontend-specialist subagent vs. handling it directly.

Quick Reference

Delegate to frontend-specialist when:

  • UI/UX design work (wireframes, themes, animations)
  • Design system implementation
  • Complex responsive layouts
  • Animation and micro-interactions
  • Visual design iterations

Handle directly when:

  • Simple HTML/CSS edits
  • Single component updates
  • Bug fixes in existing UI
  • Minor styling tweaks

Decision Matrix

✅ DELEGATE to Frontend-Specialist

Scenario Why Delegate Example
New UI design from scratch Needs staged workflow (layout → theme → animation → implement) "Create a landing page for our product"
Design system work Requires ContextScout for standards, ExternalScout for UI libs "Implement our design system with Tailwind + Shadcn"
Complex responsive layouts Needs mobile-first approach across breakpoints "Build a dashboard with sidebar, cards, and responsive grid"
Animation implementation Requires animation patterns, performance optimization "Add smooth transitions and micro-interactions to the UI"
Multi-stage design iterations Needs versioning (design_iterations/ folder) "Design a checkout flow with 3 steps"
Theme creation Requires OKLCH colors, CSS custom properties "Create a dark mode theme for the app"
Component library integration Needs ExternalScout for current docs (Flowbite, Radix, etc.) "Integrate Flowbite components into our app"
Accessibility-focused UI Requires WCAG compliance, ARIA attributes "Build an accessible form with proper labels and validation"

⚠️ HANDLE DIRECTLY (Don't Delegate)

Scenario Why Direct Example
Simple HTML edits Single file, straightforward change "Change the button text from 'Submit' to 'Send'"
Minor CSS tweaks Small styling adjustment "Make the header padding 20px instead of 16px"
Bug fixes Fixing existing code, not creating new design "Fix the broken link in the footer"
Content updates Changing text, images, or data "Update the hero section copy"
Single component updates Modifying one existing component "Add a new prop to the Button component"
Quick prototypes Throwaway code for testing "Create a quick HTML mockup to test an idea"

Delegation Checklist

Before delegating to frontend-specialist, ensure:

  • Task is UI/design focused (not backend, logic, or data)
  • Task requires design expertise (layout, theme, animations)
  • Task benefits from staged workflow (layout → theme → animation → implement)
  • Task needs context discovery (design systems, UI libraries, standards)
  • User has approved the approach (never delegate before approval)

How to Delegate

If you're unsure what context the frontend-specialist will need:

task(
  subagent_type="ContextScout",
  description="Find frontend design context",
  prompt="Find design system standards, UI component patterns, animation guidelines, and responsive breakpoint conventions for frontend work."
)

Step 2: Propose Approach

Present a plan to the user:

## Implementation Plan

**Task**: Create landing page with hero section, features grid, and CTA

**Approach**: Delegate to frontend-specialist subagent

**Why**: 
- Requires design system implementation
- Needs responsive layout across breakpoints
- Includes animations and micro-interactions
- Benefits from staged workflow (layout → theme → animation → implement)

**Context Needed**:
- Design system standards (ui/web/design-systems.md)
- UI styling standards (ui/web/ui-styling-standards.md)
- Animation patterns (ui/web/animation-patterns.md)

**Approval needed before proceeding.**

Step 3: Get Approval

Wait for explicit user approval before delegating.

Step 4: Delegate with Context

For simple delegation (no session needed):

task(
  subagent_type="frontend-specialist",
  description="Create landing page design",
  prompt="Context to load:
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/design-systems.md
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/ui-styling-standards.md
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/animation-basics.md
  
  Task: Create a landing page with:
  - Hero section with headline, subheadline, CTA button
  - Features grid (3 columns on desktop, 1 on mobile)
  - Smooth scroll animations
  
  Requirements:
  - Use Tailwind CSS + Flowbite
  - Mobile-first responsive design
  - Animations <400ms
  - Save to design_iterations/landing_1.html
  
  Follow your staged workflow:
  1. Layout (ASCII wireframe)
  2. Theme (CSS theme file)
  3. Animation (micro-interactions)
  4. Implement (HTML file)
  
  Request approval between each stage."
)

For complex delegation (with session):

Create session context file first, then delegate with session path.


Common Patterns

Pattern 1: New Landing Page

Trigger: User asks for a new landing page, marketing page, or product page

Decision: ✅ Delegate to frontend-specialist

Why: Requires full design workflow (layout, theme, animations, implementation)

Example:

User: "Create a landing page for our SaaS product"
You: [Propose approach] → [Get approval] → [Delegate to frontend-specialist]

Pattern 2: Design System Implementation

Trigger: User wants to implement or update a design system

Decision: ✅ Delegate to frontend-specialist

Why: Needs ContextScout for standards, ExternalScout for UI library docs

Example:

User: "Implement our design system using Tailwind and Shadcn"
You: [Propose approach] → [Get approval] → [Delegate to frontend-specialist]

Pattern 3: Component Library Integration

Trigger: User wants to integrate a UI component library (Flowbite, Radix, etc.)

Decision: ✅ Delegate to frontend-specialist

Why: Requires ExternalScout for current docs, proper integration patterns

Example:

User: "Add Flowbite components to our app"
You: [Propose approach] → [Get approval] → [Delegate to frontend-specialist]

Pattern 4: Animation Work

Trigger: User wants animations, transitions, or micro-interactions

Decision: ✅ Delegate to frontend-specialist

Why: Requires animation patterns, performance optimization (<400ms)

Example:

User: "Add smooth animations to the dashboard"
You: [Propose approach] → [Get approval] → [Delegate to frontend-specialist]

Pattern 5: Simple HTML Edit

Trigger: User wants to change text, fix a link, or update content

Decision: ⚠️ Handle directly (don't delegate)

Why: Simple edit, no design work needed

Example:

User: "Change the button text to 'Get Started'"
You: [Edit the HTML file directly]

Pattern 6: CSS Bug Fix

Trigger: User reports a styling bug or broken layout

Decision: ⚠️ Handle directly (don't delegate)

Why: Bug fix, not new design work

Example:

User: "The header is overlapping the content on mobile"
You: [Read the CSS, fix the issue directly]

Red Flags (Don't Delegate)

❌ User just wants a quick fix → Handle directly
❌ Task is backend/logic focused → Wrong subagent (use coder-agent or handle directly)
❌ Task is a single line change → Handle directly
❌ Task is content update → Handle directly
❌ Task is testing/validation → Wrong subagent (use tester)
❌ Task is code review → Wrong subagent (use reviewer)


Green Flags (Delegate)

✅ User wants a new UI design → Delegate
✅ Task involves design systems → Delegate
✅ Task requires responsive layouts → Delegate
✅ Task includes animations → Delegate
✅ Task needs UI library integration → Delegate
✅ Task benefits from staged workflow → Delegate
✅ Task requires design expertise → Delegate


Frontend-Specialist Capabilities

What it does well:

  • Create complete UI designs from scratch
  • Implement design systems (Tailwind, Shadcn, Flowbite)
  • Build responsive layouts (mobile-first)
  • Add animations and micro-interactions
  • Integrate UI component libraries
  • Create themes with OKLCH colors
  • Follow staged workflow (layout → theme → animation → implement)
  • Version designs (design_iterations/ folder)

What it doesn't do:

  • Backend logic or API integration
  • Database queries or data processing
  • Testing or validation
  • Code review or refactoring
  • Simple HTML/CSS edits (overkill)
  • Content updates (just text changes)

Context Files Frontend-Specialist Uses

The frontend-specialist will automatically load these via ContextScout:

Design System:

  • ui/web/design-systems.md - Theme templates, color systems
  • ui/web/ui-styling-standards.md - Tailwind, Flowbite, responsive design
  • ui/web/design-assets.md - Images, icons, fonts

Patterns:

  • ui/web/animation-patterns.md - Animation syntax, micro-interactions
  • development/frontend/react/react-patterns.md - React patterns (if React project)

Workflows:

  • core/workflows/design-iteration-overview.md - Design iteration workflow

Best Practices

Do's ✅

  • ✅ Propose before delegating - Show user the plan first
  • ✅ Get approval - Never delegate without user approval
  • ✅ Provide context - List context files the subagent should load
  • ✅ Set clear requirements - Specify design system, breakpoints, animations
  • ✅ Use staged workflow - Let frontend-specialist follow its process
  • ✅ Trust the specialist - It knows design patterns and best practices

Don'ts ❌

  • ❌ Don't delegate simple edits - Handle directly for efficiency
  • ❌ Don't skip approval - Always get user sign-off first
  • ❌ Don't delegate backend work - Wrong subagent
  • ❌ Don't micromanage - Let the specialist follow its workflow
  • ❌ Don't delegate without context - Provide context files to load
  • ❌ Don't delegate bug fixes - Handle directly unless it's a design issue

Examples

Example 1: Landing Page (Delegate)

User Request: "Create a landing page for our SaaS product with a hero section, features, and pricing"

Your Response:

## Implementation Plan

**Task**: Create SaaS landing page

**Approach**: Delegate to frontend-specialist subagent

**Why**:
- Requires full design workflow (layout, theme, animations)
- Needs responsive design across breakpoints
- Benefits from design system standards

**Context Needed**:
- Design system standards
- UI styling standards
- Animation patterns

**Approval needed before proceeding.**

After Approval:

task(
  subagent_type="frontend-specialist",
  description="Create SaaS landing page",
  prompt="Context to load:
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/design-systems.md
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/ui-styling-standards.md
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/animation-basics.md
  
  Task: Create a SaaS landing page with:
  - Hero section (headline, subheadline, CTA)
  - Features section (3-column grid)
  - Pricing section (3 tiers)
  - Footer
  
  Requirements:
  - Tailwind CSS + Flowbite
  - Mobile-first responsive
  - Smooth scroll animations
  - Modern design system
  
  Follow staged workflow and request approval between stages."
)

Example 2: Button Text Change (Direct)

User Request: "Change the 'Submit' button to say 'Send Message'"

Your Response:

I'll update the button text directly.

Action: Read the HTML file, edit the button text, done. No delegation needed.


Example 3: Design System Implementation (Delegate)

User Request: "Implement our design system using Tailwind and Shadcn components"

Your Response:

## Implementation Plan

**Task**: Implement design system with Tailwind + Shadcn

**Approach**: Delegate to frontend-specialist subagent

**Why**:
- Requires UI library integration (Shadcn)
- Needs ExternalScout for current Shadcn docs
- Benefits from design system standards

**Context Needed**:
- Design system standards
- UI styling standards
- External docs (Shadcn)

**Approval needed before proceeding.**

After Approval:

task(
  subagent_type="frontend-specialist",
  description="Implement Tailwind + Shadcn design system",
  prompt="Context to load:
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/design-systems.md
  - .opencode/context/ui/web/ui-styling-standards.md
  
  Task: Implement design system using Tailwind CSS and Shadcn/ui
  
  Requirements:
  - Call ExternalScout for current Shadcn docs
  - Set up Tailwind config
  - Integrate Shadcn components
  - Create theme file with OKLCH colors
  - Document component usage
  
  Follow staged workflow and request approval between stages."
)

Summary

Delegate to frontend-specialist when:

  • New UI designs from scratch
  • Design system implementation
  • Complex responsive layouts
  • Animation work
  • UI library integration
  • Multi-stage design iterations

Handle directly when:

  • Simple HTML/CSS edits
  • Bug fixes
  • Content updates
  • Single component updates
  • Quick prototypes

Always:

  • Propose approach first
  • Get user approval
  • Provide context files
  • Trust the specialist's workflow

  • Frontend Specialist Agent → ../../../agent/subagents/development/frontend-specialist.md
  • Design Systems → ../../ui/web/design-systems.md
  • UI Styling Standards → ../../ui/web/ui-styling-standards.md
  • Animation Patterns → ../../ui/web/animation-patterns.md
  • Delegation Workflow → ../../core/workflows/task-delegation-basics.md
  • React Patterns → react/react-patterns.md